From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@android.com,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
jreck@google.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, tkjos@google.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
dancol@google.com, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
minchan@google.com, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: Add an F_SEAL_FS_WRITE seal to memfd
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 15:20:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181009222042.9781-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> (raw)
Android uses ashmem for sharing memory regions. We are looking forward
to migrating all usecases of ashmem to memfd so that we can possibly
remove the ashmem driver in the future from staging while also
benefiting from using memfd and contributing to it. Note staging drivers
are also not ABI and generally can be removed at anytime.
One of the main usecases Android has is the ability to create a region
and mmap it as writeable, then drop its protection for "future" writes
while keeping the existing already mmap'ed writeable-region active.
This allows us to implement a usecase where receivers of the shared
memory buffer can get a read-only view, while the sender continues to
write to the buffer. See CursorWindow in Android for more details:
https://developer.android.com/reference/android/database/CursorWindow
This usecase cannot be implemented with the existing F_SEAL_WRITE seal.
To support the usecase, this patch adds a new F_SEAL_FS_WRITE seal which
prevents any future mmap and write syscalls from succeeding while
keeping the existing mmap active. The following program shows the seal
working in action:
int main() {
int ret, fd;
void *addr, *addr2, *addr3, *addr1;
ret = memfd_create_region("test_region", REGION_SIZE);
printf("ret=%d\n", ret);
fd = ret;
// Create map
addr = mmap(0, REGION_SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
if (addr == MAP_FAILED)
printf("map 0 failed\n");
else
printf("map 0 passed\n");
if ((ret = write(fd, "test", 4)) != 4)
printf("write failed even though no fs-write seal "
"(ret=%d errno =%d)\n", ret, errno);
else
printf("write passed\n");
addr1 = mmap(0, REGION_SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
if (addr1 == MAP_FAILED)
perror("map 1 prot-write failed even though no seal\n");
else
printf("map 1 prot-write passed as expected\n");
ret = fcntl(fd, F_ADD_SEALS, F_SEAL_FS_WRITE);
if (ret == -1)
printf("fcntl failed, errno: %d\n", errno);
else
printf("fs-write seal now active\n");
if ((ret = write(fd, "test", 4)) != 4)
printf("write failed as expected due to fs-write seal\n");
else
printf("write passed (unexpected)\n");
addr2 = mmap(0, REGION_SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
if (addr2 == MAP_FAILED)
perror("map 2 prot-write failed as expected due to seal\n");
else
printf("map 2 passed\n");
addr3 = mmap(0, REGION_SIZE, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
if (addr3 == MAP_FAILED)
perror("map 3 failed\n");
else
printf("map 3 prot-read passed as expected\n");
}
The output of running this program is as follows:
ret=3
map 0 passed
write passed
map 1 prot-write passed as expected
fs-write seal now active
write failed as expected due to fs-write seal
map 2 prot-write failed as expected due to seal
: Permission denied
map 3 prot-read passed as expected
Note: This seal will also prevent growing and shrinking of the memfd.
This is not something we do in Android so it does not affect us, however
I have mentioned this behavior of the seal in the manpage.
Cc: jreck@google.com
Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org
Cc: tkjos@google.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
v1->v2: No change, just added selftests to the series. manpages are
ready and I'll submit them once the patches are accepted.
include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h | 1 +
mm/memfd.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h b/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
index c98312fa78a5..fe44a2035edf 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
#define F_SEAL_SHRINK 0x0002 /* prevent file from shrinking */
#define F_SEAL_GROW 0x0004 /* prevent file from growing */
#define F_SEAL_WRITE 0x0008 /* prevent writes */
+#define F_SEAL_FS_WRITE 0x0010 /* prevent all write-related syscalls */
/* (1U << 31) is reserved for signed error codes */
/*
diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c
index 27069518e3c5..9b8855b80de9 100644
--- a/mm/memfd.c
+++ b/mm/memfd.c
@@ -150,7 +150,8 @@ static unsigned int *memfd_file_seals_ptr(struct file *file)
#define F_ALL_SEALS (F_SEAL_SEAL | \
F_SEAL_SHRINK | \
F_SEAL_GROW | \
- F_SEAL_WRITE)
+ F_SEAL_WRITE | \
+ F_SEAL_FS_WRITE)
static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals)
{
@@ -219,6 +220,9 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals)
}
}
+ if ((seals & F_SEAL_FS_WRITE) && !(*file_seals & F_SEAL_FS_WRITE))
+ file->f_mode &= ~(FMODE_WRITE | FMODE_PWRITE);
+
*file_seals |= seals;
error = 0;
--
2.19.0.605.g01d371f741-goog
next reply other threads:[~2018-10-09 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-09 22:20 Joel Fernandes (Google) [this message]
2018-10-09 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/memfd: Add tests for F_SEAL_FS_WRITE seal Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-09 22:34 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-16 21:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: Add an F_SEAL_FS_WRITE seal to memfd John Stultz
2018-10-17 9:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-17 10:39 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-17 12:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-17 15:44 ` Daniel Colascione
2018-10-17 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-17 17:45 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181009222042.9781-1-joel@joelfernandes.org \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=dancol@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=jreck@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=minchan@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).