From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:19:06 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Daniel Colascione Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Joel Fernandes , linux-kernel , kernel-team@android.com, John Reck , John Stultz , Todd Kjos , Greg KH , Andrew Morton , "J. Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , Khalid Aziz , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm , Mike Kravetz , Minchan Kim , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: Add an F_SEAL_FS_WRITE seal to memfd Message-ID: <20181017161906.GA5096@infradead.org> References: <20181009222042.9781-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20181017095155.GA354@infradead.org> <20181017103958.GB230639@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> <20181017120829.GA19731@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 08:44:01AM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote: > > Even if no one changes these specific flags we still need a lock due > > to rmw cycles on the field. For example fadvise can set or clear > > FMODE_RANDOM. It seems to use file->f_lock for synchronization. > > Compare-and-exchange will suffice, right? Only if all users use the compare and exchange, and right now they don't.