From: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: willy@infradead.org, dushistov@mail.ru, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
David.Laight@aculab.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: ufs: Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:20:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181022082003.GA3318@pathfinder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxg2Vb4fKUcN1nHUtYuapBmUNFNiMZYJaPsjKf5z4EAEuA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 02:02:57PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Yes. If you are looking for a cleanup task, you can
> apply relevant patches from my series, starting with:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9481237/
> (Leave the xfs patch [11/11] out)
>
> But besides verifying that patches still apply and build,
> you will need to address the concerns of fs maintainers.
> Take for example the btrfs patch:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9480725/
>
> It says:
> + *
> + * Values 0..7 should match common file type values in file_type.h.
> */
> #define BTRFS_FT_UNKNOWN 0
> #define BTRFS_FT_REG_FILE 1
>
> But that is not enough.
> When converting code to use the generic defines FT_*, instead of
> filesystem defined we need to leave in the code build time assertions
> that will catch an attempt to change fs contancts in the future, e.g.:
>
> static inline u8 btrfs_inode_type(struct inode *inode)
> {
> - return btrfs_type_by_mode[(inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) >> S_SHIFT];
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(BTRFS_FT_UNKNOWN != FT_UNKNOWN);
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(BTRFS_FT_REG_FILE != FT_REG_FILE);
> ...
> + return fs_umode_to_ftype(inode->i_mode);
> }
>
> Same should be done for all relevant filesystems.
> Then you need to hope that fs maintainers will like this cleanup and
> want to take the patches ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Amir.
Dear Amir,
I will give it a go and see how far I get :-)
Regards,
Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-22 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-20 22:09 [PATCH] fs: ufs: Remove switch statement from ufs_set_de_type function Phillip Potter
2018-10-20 22:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-10-20 23:07 ` Al Viro
2018-10-21 5:30 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-21 9:57 ` Phillip Potter
2018-10-21 11:02 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-10-22 8:20 ` Phillip Potter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-10-17 12:34 Phillip Potter
2018-10-17 10:08 Phillip Potter
2018-10-17 10:11 ` David Laight
2018-10-17 23:33 ` Al Viro
2018-10-18 10:19 ` Phillip Potter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181022082003.GA3318@pathfinder \
--to=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=dushistov@mail.ru \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).