Re: [PATCH 2/6] hfsplus: fix BUG on bnode parent update

["Ernesto A. Fernández" <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 02:39:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:48:46 -0300 Ernesto A. Fernández <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Sorry, I don't follow where the new_node is put twice. Could you explain
> > > in more details? Currently, it looks unclear.
> > 
> > There is a 'goto again', as I said in the commit message.  Follow the code
> > and you'll see that hfs_bnode_put() is called again on the same node.
> > 
> > > I like to assign the NULL value to the pointer.
> > 
> > This isn't a matter of taste.
> > 
> > > But are you sure that it's proper place?
> > 
> > Yes, but it's always better if somebody reviews the code...
> > 
> > > Maybe it
> > > makes sense to place this assignment in the beginning of the function?
> > 
> > Without knowing what you mean by "beginning of the function", I can't
> > tell if your idea would work or not.
> 
> I think it would be clearer to do it this way:
> 
> --- a/fs/hfs/brec.c~a
> +++ a/fs/hfs/brec.c
> @@ -359,11 +359,11 @@ static int hfs_brec_update_parent(struct
>  
>  	tree = fd->tree;
>  	node = fd->bnode;
> -	new_node = NULL;
>  	if (!node->parent)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  again:
> +	new_node = NULL;
>  	parent = hfs_bnode_find(tree, node->parent);
>  	if (IS_ERR(parent))
>  		return PTR_ERR(parent);
> 
> But it doesn't matter much...

Right, that looks better.  I don't remember why I did it this way.  If
you want me to resend I'd rather run some tests again, just in case.