From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:43208 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726051AbeKCEvM (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Nov 2018 00:51:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 19:42:35 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Gao Xiang Cc: Linus Torvalds , swhiteho@redhat.com, john.johansen@canonical.com, alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com, ebiederm@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [git pull] mount API series Message-ID: <20181102194235.GA32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20181031053355.GQ32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <28156.1541092687@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <3549.1541116763@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20181102040701.GX32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181102040701.GX32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 04:07:01AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:59:23PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > > > (*) mount-api-core. These are the internal-only patches that add the > > fs_context, the legacy wrapper and the security hooks and make certain > > filesystems make use of it. > > FWIW, while rereading that series I'd spotted something very odd in erofs. > It's orthogonal to everything else, but just to make sure it doesn't get > lost: > * sbi->dev_name thing in erofs is used only for debugging printks, > basically. Just use sb->s_id[] and be done with that. > * dump struct erofs_mount_private - you don't need dev_name in > your erofs_fill_super(). Just use mount_bdev() in usual fashion. > * what the hell are you doing with ->s_root??? Why would you > possibly want it hashed and what kind of dcache lookup could find it? > That d_rehash() looks deeply confused; what are you trying to do there? ... and while we are at it, what happens to unsigned int nameoff = le16_to_cpu(de[mid].nameoff); unsigned int matched = min(startprfx, endprfx); struct qstr dname = QSTR_INIT(data + nameoff, unlikely(mid >= ndirents - 1) ? maxsize - nameoff : le16_to_cpu(de[mid + 1].nameoff) - nameoff); /* string comparison without already matched prefix */ int ret = dirnamecmp(name, &dname, &matched); if le16_to_cpu(de[...].nameoff) is not monotonically increasing? I.e. what's to prevent e.g. (unsigned)-1 ending up in dname.len? Corrupted fs image shouldn't oops the kernel...