[PATCH] xfs: truncate transaction does not modify the inobt

[Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>]

From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

The truncate transaction does not ever modify the inode btree, but
includes an associated log reservation. Update
xfs_calc_itruncate_reservation() to remove the reservation
associated with inobt updates.

[Amir:	This commit was merged for kernel v4.16 and a twin commit was
	merged for xfsprogs v4.16. As a result, a small xfs filesystem
	formatted with features -m rmapbt=1,reflink=1 using mkfs.xfs
	version >= v4.16 cannot be mounted with kernel < v4.16.

	For example, xfstests generic/17{1,2,3} format a small fs and
	when trying to mount it, they fail with an assert on this very
	demonic line:

 XFS (vdc): Log size 3075 blocks too small, minimum size is 3717 blocks
 XFS (vdc): AAIEEE! Log failed size checks. Abort!
 XFS: Assertion failed: 0, file: src/linux/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c, line: 666

	The simple solution for stable kernels is to apply this patch,
	because mkfs.xfs v4.16 is already in the wild, so we have to
	assume that xfs filesystems with a "too small" log exist.
	Regardless, xfsprogs maintainers should also consider reverting
	the twin patch to stop creating those filesystems for the sake
	of users with unpatched kernels.]

Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---

Darrick/Dave,

It took me a while to figure out what was going on with my test systems
when small test partitions (10G) stopped working with older kernels.

Please bless this change for stable and consider the remedie for mkfs.xfs
I verified that patch cleanly applies to stable kernels 4.14.y and 4.9.y
and that I can mount a filsystem created with new mkfs.xfs.

I am now running quick tests on stable 4.14.y with configs 4k, 1k,
reflink,reflink+overlay to verify no regressions from this patch.

Thanks,
Amir.


 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c | 9 +--------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
index 6bd916bd35e2..48eff18c5496 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
@@ -232,8 +232,6 @@ xfs_calc_write_reservation(
  *    the super block to reflect the freed blocks: sector size
  *    worst case split in allocation btrees per extent assuming 4 extents:
  *		4 exts * 2 trees * (2 * max depth - 1) * block size
- *    the inode btree: max depth * blocksize
- *    the allocation btrees: 2 trees * (max depth - 1) * block size
  */
 STATIC uint
 xfs_calc_itruncate_reservation(
@@ -245,12 +243,7 @@ xfs_calc_itruncate_reservation(
 				      XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))),
 		    (xfs_calc_buf_res(9, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
 		     xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_log_count(mp, 4),
-				      XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1)) +
-		    xfs_calc_buf_res(5, 0) +
-		    xfs_calc_buf_res(xfs_allocfree_log_count(mp, 1),
-				     XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1)) +
-		    xfs_calc_buf_res(2 + mp->m_ialloc_blks +
-				     mp->m_in_maxlevels, 0)));
+				      XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1))));
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.17.1