* [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/7] userfaultfd: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep
[not found] <20181111200421.GA10551@linux.ibm.com>
@ 2018-11-11 20:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2018-11-11 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: mingo, jiangshanlai, dipankar, akpm, mathieu.desnoyers, josh,
tglx, peterz, rostedt, dhowells, edumazet, fweisbec, oleg, joel,
Lance Roy, Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel, Paul E . McKenney
From: Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>
lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
since it only checks if the current thread holds the lock regardless of
whether someone else does. This is also a step towards possibly removing
spin_is_locked().
Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index 356d2b8568c1..681881dc8a9d 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ static inline struct userfaultfd_wait_queue *find_userfault_in(
wait_queue_entry_t *wq;
struct userfaultfd_wait_queue *uwq;
- VM_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&wqh->lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wqh->lock);
uwq = NULL;
if (!waitqueue_active(wqh))
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread