From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/2] splice: increase pipe size in splice_direct_to_actor()
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:22:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181113162237.GF4235@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181109005410.GG19305@dastard>
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 11:54:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> When copy_file_range() is called on files that have been opened with
> O_DIRECT, do_splice_direct() does a manual copy of the range one
> pipe buffer at a time. The default is 16 pages, which means on
> x86_64 it is limited to 64kB IO. This is extremely slow - 64k
> synchrnous read/write will run at maybe 5-10MB/s on a spinning disk
> and be seek bound. It will be faster on SSDs, but still very
> inefficient.
>
> Increase the pipe size to the maximum allowed user size so that we
> can get decent throughput for this highly sub-optimal copy loop. Add
> a new function to the pipe code that lets us set the pipe size to
> the maximum allowed without root permissions to keep things really
> simple. We also don't care if changing the pipe size fails - that
> will just result in a slower copy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/pipe.c | 10 ++++++++++
> fs/splice.c | 7 +++++++
> include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
> index bdc5d3c0977d..436bc0464569 100644
> --- a/fs/pipe.c
> +++ b/fs/pipe.c
> @@ -1109,6 +1109,16 @@ static long pipe_set_size(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned long arg)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Set the pipe to the maximum allowable user size. Advisory only, will
> + * swallow any errors and return the resultant pipe size.
> + */
> +long pipe_set_max_safe_size(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe)
> +{
> + pipe_set_size(pipe, pipe_max_size);
> + return pipe->buffers * PAGE_SIZE;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * After the inode slimming patch, i_pipe/i_bdev/i_cdev share the same
> * location, so checking ->i_pipe is not enough to verify that this is a
> diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c
> index 3553f1956508..9749139da731 100644
> --- a/fs/splice.c
> +++ b/fs/splice.c
> @@ -931,6 +931,13 @@ ssize_t splice_direct_to_actor(struct file *in, struct splice_desc *sd,
> current->splice_pipe = pipe;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Try to increase the data holding capacity of the pipe so we can do
> + * larger IOs. This may not increase the size at all because maximum
> + * user pipe size is administrator controlled, but we still should try.
> + */
> + pipe_set_max_safe_size(pipe);
I get where you're going with this, but I have two questions:
- Is it safe to be enlarging the pipe buffer size unconditionally?
- Especially if we didn't just create the splice pipe? Suppose someone
comes along later trying to splice things and doesn't realize the pipe
is now 1MB...
Then I started wondering about the splice_pipe lifetime and couldn't
figure out if it ever gets detached from current prior to do_exit.
I don't think it does, which means that we're stuck with the 1MB
kernel memory allocation until the process dies.
--D
> +
> /*
> * Do the splice.
> */
> diff --git a/include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h b/include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h
> index 5a3bb3b7c9ad..962ba4cfcb74 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pipe_fs_i.h
> @@ -191,5 +191,6 @@ struct pipe_inode_info *get_pipe_info(struct file *file);
>
> int create_pipe_files(struct file **, int);
> unsigned int round_pipe_size(unsigned long size);
> +long pipe_set_max_safe_size(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe);
>
> #endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-14 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-08 22:19 [PATCH 0/2]: dedupe/copy_file_range fixes Dave Chinner
2018-11-08 22:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: vfs_dedupe_file_range() doesn't return EOPNOTSUPP Dave Chinner
2018-11-08 23:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-09 6:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-16 5:33 ` Dave Chinner
2018-11-08 22:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] iomap: dio data corruption and spurious errors when pipes fill Dave Chinner
2018-11-13 16:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-11-15 10:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-09 0:54 ` [PATCH 3/2] splice: increase pipe size in splice_direct_to_actor() Dave Chinner
2018-11-13 16:22 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2018-11-13 21:41 ` Dave Chinner
2018-11-15 10:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-16 5:42 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181113162237.GF4235@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).