From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH v4 16/15] fsnotify: relax WARN_ON() in fsnotify_nameremove()
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 16:58:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181206145803.32228-1-amir73il@gmail.com> (raw)
After commit "fsnotify: annotate directory entry modification events"
fsnotify_nameremove() requires that dentry->d_name and dentry->d_parent
are stable.
fsnotify_nameremove() is usually called from d_delete() from filesystem
->unlink(), ->rmdir(), ->rename() ops under parent vfs inode lock, so
said commit adds a WARN_ON() if parent inode is not locked.
fsnotify_nameremove() is also called from nfs_complete_sillyrename(),
also under parent vfs inode lock.
While the requirement of stable d_name and d_parent seems to be true
for all in-tree callers, the WARN_ON() was not true is some cases.
The following functions call d_delete() from pseudo filesystems
without parent inode lock, but those filesystems have no rename()
op, so this is not a concern: ffs_epfiles_destroy(),
rpc_gssd_dummy_depopulate(), devpts_pty_kill(), efivarfs_file_write(),
__ns_get_path(). In the last case, the dentry is a pseudo dentry
that should not generate any event.
The following functions call d_delete() from clustered filesystems
without parent inode lock, but those filesystems use clustered locks
to synchronize d_delete() with d_move():
ceph_fill_trace(), ocfs2_dentry_convert_worker().
Relax the WARN_ON() to accommodate for these two special cases:
- fs with no dir rename() op
- fs that does d_move() instead of vfs
Move the WARN_ON() into fsnotify_nameremove() where it matters.
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
Jan,
I have completed my research about d_delete() callers and my conclusions
are summarized in this patch.
Should you decide to accept the result, you would probably want to
squash this with patch 1.
I am guessing you would feel more cozy with dget_parent() and
take_dentry_name_snapshot(), but let's see if we can get an ack on
my conclusions from either Al or Miklos first.
Thanks,
Amir.
include/linux/fsnotify.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fsnotify.h b/include/linux/fsnotify.h
index 14e1f43c38c9..d20c92c3cdeb 100644
--- a/include/linux/fsnotify.h
+++ b/include/linux/fsnotify.h
@@ -22,23 +22,10 @@
*
* Unlike fsnotify_parent(), the event will be reported regardless of the
* FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD mask on the parent inode.
- *
- * When called with NULL @dir (from fsnotify_nameremove()), the dentry parent
- * inode is used as the inode to report the event to.
*/
static inline int fsnotify_dirent(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
__u32 mask)
{
- if (!dir)
- dir = d_inode(dentry->d_parent);
-
- /*
- * This helper assumes d_parent and d_name are stable. It must be true
- * when called from fsnotify_create()/fsnotify_mkdir(). Less sure about
- * all callers that get here from d_delete() => fsnotify_nameremove().
- */
- WARN_ON(!inode_is_locked(dir));
-
return fsnotify(dir, mask, d_inode(dentry), FSNOTIFY_EVENT_INODE,
dentry->d_name.name, 0);
}
@@ -158,15 +145,46 @@ static inline void fsnotify_vfsmount_delete(struct vfsmount *mnt)
/*
* fsnotify_nameremove - a filename was removed from a directory
+ *
+ * Requires that d_parent and d_name are stable.
+ *
+ * Called from d_delete() and nfs_complete_sillyrename().
+ * The latter is called from nfs client ->unlink() ->rmdir() ->rename()
+ * under parent vfs inode lock.
+ *
+ * Most filesystems call d_delete() from ->unlink() ->rmdir() ->rename()
+ * ops under parent vfs inode lock.
+ *
+ * Some pseudo filesystems call d_delete() without parent inode lock.
+ * Those filesystems have no ->rename() op and they do not call
+ * d_move() directly, so d_parent and d_name are stable by definition.
+ * Examples: devpts, efivarfs, rpc_pipefs, functionfs.
+ *
+ * Last, there are the clustered filesystems that call d_delete() on
+ * remote nodes, not under vfs parent inode lock, but they use cluster
+ * distributed locks on local and remote nodes. Those filesystems call
+ * d_delete() under their cluster lock. Examples:
+ * - in ceph_fill_trace() under CEPH_MDS_R_PARENT_LOCKED
+ * - in ocfs2_dentry_convert_worker() under ocfs2_dentry_lock
+ * But those filesystems also call d_move() under the same cluster lock
+ * (i.e. FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE), so d_parent and d_name are also stable.
*/
static inline void fsnotify_nameremove(struct dentry *dentry, int isdir)
{
+ struct inode *dir = d_inode(dentry->d_parent);
__u32 mask = FS_DELETE;
+ /* d_delete() of pseudo inode? (e.g. __ns_get_path() playing tricks) */
+ if (IS_ROOT(dentry))
+ return;
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!inode_is_locked(dir) && dir->i_op->rename &&
+ !(dir->i_sb->s_type->fs_flags & FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE));
+
if (isdir)
mask |= FS_ISDIR;
- fsnotify_dirent(NULL, dentry, mask);
+ fsnotify_dirent(dir, dentry, mask);
}
/*
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-12-06 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-06 14:58 Amir Goldstein [this message]
2019-01-04 9:03 ` [PATCH v4 16/15] fsnotify: relax WARN_ON() in fsnotify_nameremove() Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181206145803.32228-1-amir73il@gmail.com \
--to=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).