From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:34740 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1726358AbeLLQM6 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 12 Dec 2018 11:12:58 -0500
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 08:12:54 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Huaisheng Ye <yehs2007@zoho.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
        "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
        "dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
        Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
        "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        chengnt <chengnt@lenovo.com>, yehs1 <yehs1@lenovo.com>,
        colyli <colyli@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Snapshot target and DAX-capable devices
Message-ID: <20181212161254.GA20790@infradead.org>
References: <e38303902267d2d8bae8b0c88da84a4ed668e9fb.camel@hpe.com>
 <20180828075025.GA17756@quack2.suse.cz>
 <20180828175630.GA1197@redhat.com>
 <20180830093028.GC1767@quack2.suse.cz>
 <20180830184907.GA14867@redhat.com>
 <x494lfbabwi.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1808301545200.30950@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
 <20180830233809.GH1572@dastard>
 <20180831094255.GB11622@quack2.suse.cz>
 <167a3303a01.11a848ab768799.5161498967766415143@zoho.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <167a3303a01.11a848ab768799.5161498967766415143@zoho.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Does it really make sense to enhance dm-snapshot?  I thought all serious
users of snapshots had moved on to dm-thinp?