From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42]:40386 "EHLO mail-wm1-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727010AbfAGMkC (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2019 07:40:02 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:39:58 +0300 From: Alexey Dobriyan To: Mateusz =?utf-8?B?U3TEmXBpZcWE?= Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Old content of /proc/net after switching network namespace Message-ID: <20190107123957.GA570@avx2> References: <4749d3bd-eac9-2a3e-aa93-d76d2e015945@netrounds.com> <20190104110933.GA2682@avx2> <165a35df-0a38-3507-fb8d-0f4b45af0dc3@netrounds.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <165a35df-0a38-3507-fb8d-0f4b45af0dc3@netrounds.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 09:54:26AM +0100, Mateusz Stępień wrote: > Thank you for the quick response, unfortunately the patch does not work, > problem still persist. OK, I reproduced the bug. > I saw the other mail thread, and it looks like the proper solution > described by Al will take some time. I don't know if we can afford right > now to write a proper patch ourselves, also at least my understanding is > that this is a regression, so my question is: can we expect a proper > patch in a coming weeks? If not, will reverting the patch at fault have > any more negative side effects? Of course it will bring back the > behaviour it was supposed to fix, but are there any other issues? Other issues, no.