From: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] xarray: Document erasing entries during iteration
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 08:40:20 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190212214020.1995-1-tobin@kernel.org> (raw)
The XArray is, in a way, a replacement data structure for linked lists,
as such, on first use developers may wonder if it is safe to remove
items while iterating over the array.
For example, this is fine:
DEFINE_XARRAY(things);
void cleanup()
{
struct thing *thing;
unsigned long index;
xa_for_each(&things, index, thing)
xa_erase(&things, index);
}
Document this feature explicitly in the docs and also for the macro
definition.
Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <tobin@kernel.org>
---
Changes since v1:
- Use the correct function name (its hard to get good help ;)
Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst | 3 ++-
include/linux/xarray.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst b/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst
index 5d54b27c6eba..814187c43401 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/xarray.rst
@@ -97,7 +97,8 @@ You can copy entries out of the XArray into a plain array by calling
:c:func:`xa_extract`. Or you can iterate over the present entries in
the XArray by calling :c:func:`xa_for_each`. You may prefer to use
:c:func:`xa_find` or :c:func:`xa_find_after` to move to the next present
-entry in the XArray.
+entry in the XArray. It is safe to call :c:func:`xa_erase` on entries
+as you iterate over the array using :c:func:`xa_for_each`.
Calling :c:func:`xa_store_range` stores the same entry in a range
of indices. If you do this, some of the other operations will behave
diff --git a/include/linux/xarray.h b/include/linux/xarray.h
index 5d9d318bcf7a..1f8974281a0a 100644
--- a/include/linux/xarray.h
+++ b/include/linux/xarray.h
@@ -407,6 +407,8 @@ static inline bool xa_marked(const struct xarray *xa, xa_mark_t mark)
* you should use the xas_for_each() iterator instead. The xas_for_each()
* iterator will expand into more inline code than xa_for_each().
*
+ * It is safe to erase entries from the XArray as you iterate over it.
+ *
* Context: Any context. Takes and releases the RCU lock.
*/
#define xa_for_each(xa, index, entry) \
--
2.20.1
reply other threads:[~2019-02-12 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190212214020.1995-1-tobin@kernel.org \
--to=tobin@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).