From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D40CC43381 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2B32075A for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:34:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1550763267; bh=wwAPMEhYtVcOn5aXGGayEeTVcRs/Bctzi/TedrlPz38=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=GZ5CCl95JdYXccUy8asVy5KwaXrrhcaTo+7nrQPf4EjdtqyDFGeCaAEQmSvpIphLN wh7PIubj7HMOHHg8sxo/OGgJPJs1VCVozXw6kKgo42BnQu1DQPxeDeYxLZMGpM43yk sirbr7fAzsRukKHTLkunaY1TY/48lyCCShV742+M= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728303AbfBUPeV (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:34:21 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f171.google.com ([209.85.214.171]:35968 "EHLO mail-pl1-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728003AbfBUPeT (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:34:19 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f171.google.com with SMTP id k2so5000804plt.3; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:34:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XPqRx3G1zDibY5f11Kqd711bReAyQUyuceYskmJlDgk=; b=RAq/nOTgaUz8QTrQthUrzxjB4+4yBaXNVkFDPTnCRYtdvSNlO3HUoVJev+T7CadpIk /k0zPi5SWDDWVswkJZwoczJqwzVkziqSHYIBn6XfdIATMKr0YY2WLAm8wp3TTrYu+33l OWM9j+RI+mxlqRUv8nJXSoosTYdlfAG+y5gdVw1hAQn39TvEQ2XQO0X4pgI9a0qY5QCC MTxuYWHhPnx1I2YVBO908d1eU8KI3X3oyin18PX5RZUKdFvvcUl6S8/oESZ1ZGrqVnWg U3quDQDj1fUzBrwUtG5nzPj1a5qmiWEMT+BDdgLrIzOvxvlUr8VIde1hrvGHp4F1zHFk TBAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuajaahaymSALzojtMR+fkbAkPjV2YRpLn/slp2prrvlSkY6uRm7 dZnMzhZ3kZgCQuCgSbSnqjc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbQhHLkj+rQEswB+BoVSLMBa9mIIZ3HP92lYutjhoqXwJf0K2FXjHuJFvPPK+SFR0rkJuuRpA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9003:: with SMTP id a3mr15817741plp.2.1550763258257; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:34:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from garbanzo.do-not-panic.com (c-73-71-40-85.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.71.40.85]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a20sm34713724pfj.5.2019.02.21.07.34.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:34:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by garbanzo.do-not-panic.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:34:15 -0800 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:34:15 -0800 From: Luis Chamberlain To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , James Bottomley , Sasha Levin , Greg KH , Amir Goldstein , Steve French , lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel , linux-mm , LKML Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] FS, MM, and stable trees Message-ID: <20190221153415.GL11489@garbanzo.do-not-panic.com> References: <20190213073707.GA2875@kroah.com> <20190213091803.GA2308@kroah.com> <20190213192512.GH69686@sasha-vm> <20190213195232.GA10047@kroah.com> <1550088875.2871.21.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20190215015020.GJ69686@sasha-vm> <1550198902.2802.12.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20190216182835.GF23000@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190216182835.GF23000@mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 01:28:35PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > The block/*, loop/* and scsi/* tests in blktests do seem to be in > pretty good shape. The nvme, nvmeof, and srp tests are *definitely* > not as mature. Can you say more about this later part. What would you like to see more of for nvme tests for instance? It sounds like a productive session would include tracking our: a) sour spots b) who's already working on these c) gather volutneers for these sour spots Luis