From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: don't allow most setxattr to immutable files
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 08:29:48 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190328212948.GL23020@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <155379545404.24796.5019142212767521955.stgit@magnolia>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:50:54AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
>
> The chattr manpage has this to say about immutable files:
>
> "A file with the 'i' attribute cannot be modified: it cannot be deleted
> or renamed, no link can be created to this file, most of the file's
> metadata can not be modified, and the file can not be opened in write
> mode."
>
> However, we don't actually check the immutable flag in the setattr code,
> which means that we can update project ids and extent size hints on
> supposedly immutable files. Therefore, reject a setattr call on an
> immutable file except for the case where we're trying to unset
> IMMUTABLE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> index 2bd1c5ab5008..9cf0bc0ae2bd 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> @@ -1067,6 +1067,14 @@ xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags(
> !capable(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE))
> return -EPERM;
>
> + /*
> + * If immutable is set and we are not clearing it, we're not allowed
> + * to change anything else in the inode.
> + */
> + if ((ip->i_d.di_flags & XFS_DIFLAG_IMMUTABLE) &&
> + (fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_IMMUTABLE))
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> /* diflags2 only valid for v3 inodes. */
> di_flags2 = xfs_flags2diflags2(ip, fa->fsx_xflags);
> if (di_flags2 && ip->i_d.di_version < 3)
Looks fine - catches both FS_IOC_SETFLAGS and FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR
for XFS.
Do the other filesystems that implement FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR have
the same bug?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-28 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-28 17:50 [PATCH 0/3] vfs: make immutable files actually immutable Darrick J. Wong
2019-03-28 17:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/fs: don't allow writes to immutable files Darrick J. Wong
2019-03-28 17:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: reset page mappings after setting immutable Darrick J. Wong
2019-03-28 21:21 ` Dave Chinner
2019-04-05 0:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-03-28 17:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: don't allow most setxattr to immutable files Darrick J. Wong
2019-03-28 21:24 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-03-28 21:29 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2019-03-29 4:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190328212948.GL23020@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).