From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: reset page mappings after setting immutable
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 17:29:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190405002929.GD1177@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190328212147.GK23020@dastard>
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:21:47AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:50:47AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> >
> > The chattr manpage has this to say about immutable files:
> >
> > "A file with the 'i' attribute cannot be modified: it cannot be deleted
> > or renamed, no link can be created to this file, most of the file's
> > metadata can not be modified, and the file can not be opened in write
> > mode."
> >
> > This means that we need to flush the page cache when setting the
>
> nit: flush and invalidate the page cache.
>
> > immutable flag so that programs cannot continue to write to writable
> > mappings.
>
> Do we even need to invalidate the page cache for this? i.e. we've
> cleaned the pages so that any new write to them will fault,
> that will see the immutable flag via ->page_mkwrite and then the
> app should segv, right?
Yeah, we only need to flush the pages. No need to invalidate.
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > index 6ecdbb3af7de..2bd1c5ab5008 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> > @@ -998,6 +998,37 @@ xfs_diflags_to_linux(
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > +static int
> > +xfs_ioctl_setattr_flush(
> > + struct xfs_inode *ip,
> > + int *join_flags)
> > +{
> > + struct inode *inode = VFS_I(ip);
> > + int error;
> > +
> > + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> > + return 0;
> > + if ((*join_flags) & (XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL | XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* lock, flush and invalidate mapping in preparation for flag change */
> > + xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
> > + error = filemap_write_and_wait(inode->i_mapping);
> > + if (error)
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + error = invalidate_inode_pages2(inode->i_mapping);
> > + if (error)
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > +
> > + *join_flags = XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +out_unlock:
> > + xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL | XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
> > + return error;
> > +
> > +}
>
> Doesn't wait for direct IO to drain. Wouldn't it be better to do
> this?
>
> lock()
> xfs_flush_unmap_range(ip, 0, XFS_SIZE(ip));
> unlock()
But if we only need to filemap_write_and_wait, then calling flush_unmap
(which also calls truncate_pagecache_range) is too much work.
--D
>
> Otherwise looks ok.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-05 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-28 17:50 [PATCH 0/3] vfs: make immutable files actually immutable Darrick J. Wong
2019-03-28 17:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/fs: don't allow writes to immutable files Darrick J. Wong
2019-03-28 17:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: reset page mappings after setting immutable Darrick J. Wong
2019-03-28 21:21 ` Dave Chinner
2019-04-05 0:29 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-03-28 17:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: don't allow most setxattr to immutable files Darrick J. Wong
2019-03-28 21:24 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-03-28 21:29 ` Dave Chinner
2019-03-29 4:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190405002929.GD1177@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).