From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Shawn Landden <shawn@git.icu>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new flag COPY_FILE_RANGE_FILESIZE for copy_file_range()
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 18:02:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190414010254.GA7408@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190413205439.9623-1-shawn@git.icu>
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 03:54:39PM -0500, Shawn Landden wrote:
/me pulls out his close-reading glasses and the copy_file_range manpage...
> If flags includes COPY_FILE_RANGE_FILESIZE then the length
> copied is the length of the file. off_in and off_out are
> ignored. len must be 0 or the file size.
They're ignored? As in the copy operation reads the number of bytes in
the file referenced by fd_in from fd_in at its current position and is
writes that out to fd_out at its current position? I don't see why I
would want such an operation...
...but I can see how people could make use of a CFR_ENTIRE_FILE that
would check that both file descriptors are actually regular files, and
if so copy the entire contents of the fd_in file into the same position
in the fd_out file, and then set the fd_out file's length to match. If
@off_in or @off_out are non-NULL then they'll be updated to the new EOFs
if the copy completes succesfully and @len can be anything.
Also: please update the manual page and the xfstests regression test for
this syscall.
> This implementation saves a call to stat() in the common case
> of copying files. It does not fix any race conditions, but that
> is possible in the future with this interface.
>
> EAGAIN: If COPY_FILE_RANGE_FILESIZE was passed and len is not 0
> or the file size.
The values are invalid, so why would we tell userspace to try again
instead of the EINVAL that we usually use?
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Landden <shawn@git.icu>
> CC: <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/read_write.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> include/uapi/linux/stat.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> index 61b43ad7608e..6d06361f0856 100644
> --- a/fs/read_write.c
> +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> @@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> struct inode *inode_out = file_inode(file_out);
> ssize_t ret;
>
> - if (flags != 0)
> + if ((flags & ~COPY_FILE_RANGE_FILESIZE) != 0)
FWIW you might as well shorten the prefix to "CFR_" since nobody else is
using it.
--D
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (S_ISDIR(inode_in->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode_out->i_mode))
> @@ -1565,6 +1565,18 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> if (!S_ISREG(inode_in->i_mode) || !S_ISREG(inode_out->i_mode))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (flags & COPY_FILE_RANGE_FILESIZE) {
> + struct kstat stat;
> + int error;
> + error = vfs_getattr(&file_in->f_path, &stat,
> + STATX_SIZE, 0);
> + if (error < 0)
> + return error;
> + if (!(len == 0 || len == stat.size))
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + len = stat.size;
> + }
> +
> ret = rw_verify_area(READ, file_in, &pos_in, len);
> if (unlikely(ret))
> return ret;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/stat.h b/include/uapi/linux/stat.h
> index 7b35e98d3c58..1075aa4666ef 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/stat.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/stat.h
> @@ -170,5 +170,9 @@ struct statx {
>
> #define STATX_ATTR_AUTOMOUNT 0x00001000 /* Dir: Automount trigger */
>
> +/*
> + * Flags for copy_file_range()
> + */
> +#define COPY_FILE_RANGE_FILESIZE 0x00000001 /* Copy the full length of the input file */
>
> #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_STAT_H */
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-14 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-13 20:54 [PATCH] new flag COPY_FILE_RANGE_FILESIZE for copy_file_range() Shawn Landden
2019-04-14 1:02 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-04-14 7:10 ` Amir Goldstein
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-13 20:49 Shawn Landden
2019-04-13 21:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-14 0:25 ` Shawn Landden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190414010254.GA7408@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shawn@git.icu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).