From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DFCC43219 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690E6215EA for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729187AbfD2ToT (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 15:44:19 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:40835 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729054AbfD2ToT (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 15:44:19 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 60A8068AFE; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:44:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:44:03 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andreas Gruenbacher Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com, Christoph Hellwig , Bob Peterson , Jan Kara , Dave Chinner , Ross Lagerwall , Mark Syms , Edwin =?iso-8859-1?B?VPZy9ms=?= , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] iomap: Add a page_prepare callback Message-ID: <20190429194403.GC6138@lst.de> References: <20190429163239.4874-1-agruenba@redhat.com> <20190429163239.4874-3-agruenba@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190429163239.4874-3-agruenba@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org > +static int gfs2_iomap_page_prepare(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, > + unsigned len, struct iomap *iomap) > +{ > + return 0; > +} Now that we check for each callback there is no need to add a dummy one in this patch. But given that that won't change the end result: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig