linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com>,
	Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] vfs: remove redundant checks from generic_remap_checks()
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 09:37:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190528163718.GI5221@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190526061100.21761-9-amir73il@gmail.com>

On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 09:10:59AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> The access limit checks on input file range in generic_remap_checks()
> are redundant because the input file size is guarantied to be within

                                    guaranteed ^^^^^^^^^^

> limits and pos+len are already checked to be within input file size.
> 
> Beyond the fact that the check cannot fail, if it would have failed,
> it could return -EFBIG for input file range error. There is no precedent
> for that. -EFBIG is returned in syscalls that would change file length.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/filemap.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 1852fbf08eeb..7e1aa36d57a2 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -3000,10 +3000,6 @@ int generic_remap_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	count = min(count, size_in - (uint64_t)pos_in);
>  
> -	ret = generic_access_check_limits(file_in, pos_in, &count);

I suspect you could fold generic_access_check_limits into its only
caller, then...

--D

> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
>  	ret = generic_write_check_limits(file_out, pos_out, &count);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-28 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-26  6:10 [PATCH v2 0/8] Fixes for major copy_file_range() issues Amir Goldstein
2019-05-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] vfs: introduce generic_copy_file_range() Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:11   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] vfs: no fallback for ->copy_file_range Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:09   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] vfs: introduce generic_file_rw_checks() Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:14   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] vfs: add missing checks to copy_file_range Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-28 16:26     ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:31       ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-28 16:39         ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] vfs: copy_file_range needs to strip setuid bits Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:25   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-31 19:34   ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-05-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] vfs: copy_file_range should update file timestamps Amir Goldstein
2019-05-27 14:35   ` Luis Henriques
2019-05-27 22:05     ` Dave Chinner
2019-05-28  8:53       ` Luis Henriques
2019-05-28 16:30   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-28 16:36     ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across devices Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-26  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] vfs: remove redundant checks from generic_remap_checks() Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:37   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-05-26  6:11 ` [PATCH v2 9/8] man-pages: copy_file_range updates Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-29 16:20     ` Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190528163718.GI5221@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=lhenriques@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).