From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Olga Kornievskaia <olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com>,
Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] vfs: remove redundant checks from generic_remap_checks()
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 09:37:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190528163718.GI5221@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190526061100.21761-9-amir73il@gmail.com>
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 09:10:59AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> The access limit checks on input file range in generic_remap_checks()
> are redundant because the input file size is guarantied to be within
guaranteed ^^^^^^^^^^
> limits and pos+len are already checked to be within input file size.
>
> Beyond the fact that the check cannot fail, if it would have failed,
> it could return -EFBIG for input file range error. There is no precedent
> for that. -EFBIG is returned in syscalls that would change file length.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/filemap.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 1852fbf08eeb..7e1aa36d57a2 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -3000,10 +3000,6 @@ int generic_remap_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> return -EINVAL;
> count = min(count, size_in - (uint64_t)pos_in);
>
> - ret = generic_access_check_limits(file_in, pos_in, &count);
I suspect you could fold generic_access_check_limits into its only
caller, then...
--D
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> ret = generic_write_check_limits(file_out, pos_out, &count);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-28 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-26 6:10 [PATCH v2 0/8] Fixes for major copy_file_range() issues Amir Goldstein
2019-05-26 6:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] vfs: introduce generic_copy_file_range() Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-26 6:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] vfs: no fallback for ->copy_file_range Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-26 6:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] vfs: introduce generic_file_rw_checks() Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-26 6:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] vfs: add missing checks to copy_file_range Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-28 16:26 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-28 16:39 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-26 6:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] vfs: copy_file_range needs to strip setuid bits Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-31 19:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-05-26 6:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] vfs: copy_file_range should update file timestamps Amir Goldstein
2019-05-27 14:35 ` Luis Henriques
2019-05-27 22:05 ` Dave Chinner
2019-05-28 8:53 ` Luis Henriques
2019-05-28 16:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-28 16:36 ` Amir Goldstein
2019-05-26 6:10 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across devices Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-26 6:10 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] vfs: remove redundant checks from generic_remap_checks() Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:37 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-05-26 6:11 ` [PATCH v2 9/8] man-pages: copy_file_range updates Amir Goldstein
2019-05-28 16:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-05-29 16:20 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190528163718.GI5221@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=lhenriques@suse.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).