linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"shhuiw@foxmail.com" <shhuiw@foxmail.com>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix SQPOLL cpu check
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:24:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190612092403.GA38578@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5D2859FE-DB39-48F5-BBB5-6EDD3791B6C3@raithlin.com>

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:56:06PM +0000, Stephen  Bates wrote:
> The array_index_nospec() check in io_sq_offload_start() is performed
> before any checks on p->sq_thread_cpu are done. This means cpu is
> clamped and therefore no error occurs when out-of-range values are
> passed in from userspace. This is in violation of the specification
> for io_ring_setup() and causes the io_ring_setup unit test in liburing
> to regress.
> 
> Add a new bounds check on sq_thread_cpu at the start of
> io_sq_offload_start() so we can exit the function early when bad
> values are passed in.
> 
> Fixes: 975554b03edd ("io_uring: fix SQPOLL cpu validation")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>

Aargh. My original patch [1] handled that correctly, and this case was
explicitly called out in the commit message, which was retained even
when the patch was "simplified". That's rather disappointing. :/

Thanks,
Mark.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190430123451.44227-1-mark.rutland@arm.com/

> ---
>  fs/io_uring.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 30a5687..e458470 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -2316,6 +2316,9 @@ static int io_sq_offload_start(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (p->sq_thread_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->sqo_wait);
>  	mmgrab(current->mm);
>  	ctx->sqo_mm = current->mm;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-12  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-11 23:56 [PATCH] io_uring: fix SQPOLL cpu check Stephen  Bates
2019-06-12  9:24 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-06-12  9:47   ` Stephen  Bates
2019-06-13  8:54     ` Jens Axboe
2019-06-13  9:14       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-13  9:15         ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190612092403.GA38578@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
    --cc=shhuiw@foxmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).