From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] fs: fold __generic_write_end back into generic_write_end
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:09:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626200937.GJ5171@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190626132335.14809-2-agruenba@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 03:23:34PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> This effectively reverts a6d639da63ae ("fs: factor out a
> __generic_write_end helper") as we now open code what is left of that
> helper in iomap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Looks ok,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
--D
> ---
> fs/buffer.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> fs/internal.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index e450c55f6434..49a871570092 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -2086,38 +2086,6 @@ int block_write_begin(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t pos, unsigned len,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(block_write_begin);
>
> -void __generic_write_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, unsigned copied,
> - struct page *page)
> -{
> - loff_t old_size = inode->i_size;
> - bool i_size_changed = false;
> -
> - /*
> - * No need to use i_size_read() here, the i_size cannot change under us
> - * because we hold i_rwsem.
> - *
> - * But it's important to update i_size while still holding page lock:
> - * page writeout could otherwise come in and zero beyond i_size.
> - */
> - if (pos + copied > inode->i_size) {
> - i_size_write(inode, pos + copied);
> - i_size_changed = true;
> - }
> -
> - unlock_page(page);
> -
> - if (old_size < pos)
> - pagecache_isize_extended(inode, old_size, pos);
> - /*
> - * Don't mark the inode dirty under page lock. First, it unnecessarily
> - * makes the holding time of page lock longer. Second, it forces lock
> - * ordering of page lock and transaction start for journaling
> - * filesystems.
> - */
> - if (i_size_changed)
> - mark_inode_dirty(inode);
> -}
> -
> int block_write_end(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
> loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned copied,
> struct page *page, void *fsdata)
> @@ -2158,9 +2126,37 @@ int generic_write_end(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
> loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned copied,
> struct page *page, void *fsdata)
> {
> + struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> + loff_t old_size = inode->i_size;
> + bool i_size_changed = false;
> +
> copied = block_write_end(file, mapping, pos, len, copied, page, fsdata);
> - __generic_write_end(mapping->host, pos, copied, page);
> +
> + /*
> + * No need to use i_size_read() here, the i_size cannot change under us
> + * because we hold i_rwsem.
> + *
> + * But it's important to update i_size while still holding page lock:
> + * page writeout could otherwise come in and zero beyond i_size.
> + */
> + if (pos + copied > inode->i_size) {
> + i_size_write(inode, pos + copied);
> + i_size_changed = true;
> + }
> +
> + unlock_page(page);
> put_page(page);
> +
> + if (old_size < pos)
> + pagecache_isize_extended(inode, old_size, pos);
> + /*
> + * Don't mark the inode dirty under page lock. First, it unnecessarily
> + * makes the holding time of page lock longer. Second, it forces lock
> + * ordering of page lock and transaction start for journaling
> + * filesystems.
> + */
> + if (i_size_changed)
> + mark_inode_dirty(inode);
> return copied;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_write_end);
> diff --git a/fs/internal.h b/fs/internal.h
> index a48ef81be37d..2f3c3de51fad 100644
> --- a/fs/internal.h
> +++ b/fs/internal.h
> @@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ static inline int __sync_blockdev(struct block_device *bdev, int wait)
> extern void guard_bio_eod(int rw, struct bio *bio);
> extern int __block_write_begin_int(struct page *page, loff_t pos, unsigned len,
> get_block_t *get_block, struct iomap *iomap);
> -void __generic_write_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, unsigned copied,
> - struct page *page);
>
> /*
> * char_dev.c
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-26 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-26 13:23 [PATCH v2 1/3] iomap: don't mark the inode dirty in iomap_write_end Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-06-26 13:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] fs: fold __generic_write_end back into generic_write_end Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-06-26 20:09 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2019-06-26 13:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] iomap: fix page_done callback for short writes Andreas Gruenbacher
2019-06-26 13:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-26 20:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-26 20:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] iomap: don't mark the inode dirty in iomap_write_end Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190626200937.GJ5171@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).