linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Liu Yiding <liuyd.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix .bi_size overflow
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 08:36:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190701063613.GA20733@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190701041644.16052-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 12:16:44PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> 'bio->bi_iter.bi_size' is 'unsigned int', which at most hold 4G - 1
> bytes.
> 
> Before 07173c3ec276 ("block: enable multipage bvecs"), one bio can
> include very limited pages, and usually at most 256, so the fs bio
> size won't be bigger than 1M bytes most of times.
> 
> Since we support multi-page bvec, in theory one fs bio really can
> be added > 1M pages, especially in case of hugepage, or big writeback
> in case of huge dirty pages. Then there is chance in which .bi_size
> is overflowed.
> 
> Fixes this issue by adding bio_will_full() which checks if the added
> segment may overflow .bi_size.

Can you please just add the argument to bio_full?  bio_will_full sounds
rather odd.

Maybe also add a kerneldoc comment to the new bio_full to explain
it.  Otherwise this looks fine to me.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-01  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-01  4:16 [PATCH] block: fix .bi_size overflow Ming Lei
2019-07-01  6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-07-01  6:46   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190701063613.GA20733@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuyd.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).