From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=wVUQ=VP=vger.kernel.org=linux-fsdevel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,
	USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F2DC76191
	for <linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 08:42:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE4B208C0
	for <linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 08:42:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726551AbfGRImS (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 18 Jul 2019 04:42:18 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:57819 "EHLO verein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726386AbfGRImR (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 18 Jul 2019 04:42:17 -0400
Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407)
        id A8FCC68B05; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:42:13 +0200 (CEST)
Date:   Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:42:13 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>,
        Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
        Mike Anderson <andmike@linux.ibm.com>,
        Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] swiotlb: Remove call to sme_active()
Message-ID: <20190718084213.GA24562@lst.de>
References: <20190718032858.28744-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> <20190718032858.28744-3-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190718032858.28744-3-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:28:54AM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> sme_active() is an x86-specific function so it's better not to call it from
> generic code.
> 
> There's no need to mention which memory encryption feature is active, so
> just use a more generic message. Besides, other architectures will have
> different names for similar technology.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>