From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D36C43331 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 20:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580A42081B for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 20:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394492AbfIFUZB (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2019 16:25:01 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:35066 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2394484AbfIFUZB (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2019 16:25:01 -0400 Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.1 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i6Kmx-0002cR-I1; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 20:24:59 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 21:24:59 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fuse / work,mount coordination Message-ID: <20190906202459.GZ1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20190906170730.GY1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 09:31:39PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 7:07 PM Al Viro wrote: > > > > Could you switch your branch to pulling vfs.git#work.mount-base, > > drop cherry-picked "vfs: Create fs_context-aware mount_bdev() replacement" > > and use get_tree_bdev() instead of vfs_get_block_super()? > > > > I'd like to put #work.mount1 into -next instead of current > > #work.mount, and doing that would obviously cause conflict with your > > cherry-pick. #work.mount-base is the infrastructure part of that > > series and it'll be in never-rebased mode. > > Done and pushed. ... and the same on my side.