From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD079C4CEC9 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 18:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9162521897 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 18:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729391AbfIQSad (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:30:33 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:47650 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729139AbfIQSad (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 14:30:33 -0400 Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iAIFB-0002af-Tt; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 18:30:30 +0000 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 19:30:29 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Richard Weinberger Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , virtio-fs@redhat.com, Miklos Szeredi , David Howells , linux-fsdevel , Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: [PATCH] init/do_mounts.c: add virtiofs root fs support Message-ID: <20190917183029.GH1131@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20190906100324.8492-1-stefanha@redhat.com> <20190909070039.GB13708@stefanha-x1.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:19:55PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > mtd, ubi, virtiofs and 9p have one thing in common, they are not block devices. > What about a new miscroot= kernel parameter? How about something like xfs!sda5 or nfs!foo.local.net/bar, etc.? With ubi et.al. covered by the same syntax...