linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>,
	linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
	"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: copy_file_range() errno changes introduced in v5.3-rc1
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 19:57:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190926175700.GA12619@x230> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxixSy7Wp7yWYOMpp8R5tFXD2SWR9t3koYO4jBE-Wnt8sQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Amir,

> > > > * 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across devices") started to return -EXDEV.

> Started to return EXDEV?? quite the opposite.
> But LTP tests where already adapted to that behavior AFAICT:
> 15cac7b46 syscalls/copy_file_range01: add cross-device test
I'm talking about copy_file_range02 (15cac7b46 changes copy_file_range01).

Anyway, the problem which I want to fix is a backward compatibility for v5.2 and
older to fix errors like this:

copy_file_range02.c:102: INFO: Test #7: overlaping range
copy_file_range02.c:134: FAIL: copy_file_range returned wrong value: 16
copy_file_range02.c:102: INFO: Test #8: block device
copy_file_range02.c:128: FAIL: copy_file_range failed unexpectedly; expected EINVAL, but got: EXDEV (18)
copy_file_range02.c:102: INFO: Test #9: char device
copy_file_range02.c:128: FAIL: copy_file_range failed unexpectedly; expected EINVAL, but got: EXDEV (18)
...
copy_file_range02.c:102: INFO: Test #11: max length lenght
copy_file_range02.c:128: FAIL: copy_file_range failed unexpectedly; expected EOVERFLOW, but got: EINVAL (22)
copy_file_range02.c:102: INFO: Test #12: max file size
copy_file_range02.c:128: FAIL: copy_file_range failed unexpectedly; expected EFBIG, but got: EINVAL (22)

LTP hasn't defined yet any policy about changing errnos,
as it's probably best to check whether change was intentional
(like your obvious fixes) or not.

> > > > * 96e6e8f4a68d ("vfs: add missing checks to copy_file_range") started to return -EPERM, -ETXTBSY, -EOVERFLOW.

> > > I'm not Amir, but by my recollection, yes, those are intentional. :)
> > Thanks for a quick confirmation.


> Which reminds me - I forgot to send the man pages patch out to maintainer:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20190529174318.22424-15-amir73il@gmail.com/

> At least according to man page -EACCES is also possible.
Thanks for fixing man :).

Kind regards,
Petr

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-26 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-26 15:56 copy_file_range() errno changes introduced in v5.3-rc1 Petr Vorel
2019-09-26 16:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-09-26 16:19   ` Petr Vorel
2019-09-26 16:33     ` Amir Goldstein
2019-09-26 16:50       ` Amir Goldstein
2019-09-26 17:57       ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2019-09-26 18:07         ` Amir Goldstein
2019-09-27  8:25           ` Petr Vorel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190926175700.GA12619@x230 \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).