* [PATCH] fs: include internal.h for missing declarations
@ 2019-10-11 17:00 Ben Dooks
2019-10-15 8:05 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2019-10-11 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Ben Dooks, Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
The declarations of __block_write_begin_int and guard_bio_eod
are needed from internal.h so include it to fix the following
sparse warnings:
fs/buffer.c:1930:5: warning: symbol '__block_write_begin_int' was not declared. Should it be static?
fs/buffer.c:2994:6: warning: symbol 'guard_bio_eod' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
---
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
fs/buffer.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
index 86a38b979323..792f22a88e67 100644
--- a/fs/buffer.c
+++ b/fs/buffer.c
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
#include <trace/events/block.h>
+#include "internal.h"
+
static int fsync_buffers_list(spinlock_t *lock, struct list_head *list);
static int submit_bh_wbc(int op, int op_flags, struct buffer_head *bh,
enum rw_hint hint, struct writeback_control *wbc);
--
2.23.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] fs: include internal.h for missing declarations
2019-10-11 17:00 [PATCH] fs: include internal.h for missing declarations Ben Dooks
@ 2019-10-15 8:05 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2019-10-15 8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Dooks; +Cc: linux-kernel, Alexander Viro, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
On Fri 11-10-19 18:00:39, Ben Dooks wrote:
> The declarations of __block_write_begin_int and guard_bio_eod
> are needed from internal.h so include it to fix the following
> sparse warnings:
>
> fs/buffer.c:1930:5: warning: symbol '__block_write_begin_int' was not declared. Should it be static?
> fs/buffer.c:2994:6: warning: symbol 'guard_bio_eod' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
OK, makes sense to keep declarations in sync with real functions. Thanks
for the patch a feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> fs/buffer.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c
> index 86a38b979323..792f22a88e67 100644
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
> #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> #include <trace/events/block.h>
>
> +#include "internal.h"
> +
> static int fsync_buffers_list(spinlock_t *lock, struct list_head *list);
> static int submit_bh_wbc(int op, int op_flags, struct buffer_head *bh,
> enum rw_hint hint, struct writeback_control *wbc);
> --
> 2.23.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-15 8:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-11 17:00 [PATCH] fs: include internal.h for missing declarations Ben Dooks
2019-10-15 8:05 ` Jan Kara
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).