From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>,
Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com>,
Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@google.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fscrypt: add support for inline-encryption-optimized policies
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:27:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191024012759.GA32358@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191023125701.GA2460@mit.edu>
> If and when the vaporware shows up in real hardware, and assuming that
> fscrypt is useful for this hardware, we can name it
> "super_duper_fancy_inline_crypto". :-)
I think you are entirely missing the point. The point is that naming
the option someting related to inline encryption is fundamentally
wrong. It is related to a limitation of existing inline crypto
engines, not related to the fudamental model. And all the other
rambling below don't matter either.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-24 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-21 23:03 [PATCH 0/3] fscrypt: support for inline-encryption-optimized policies Eric Biggers
2019-10-21 23:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] fscrypt: add " Eric Biggers
2019-10-22 5:27 ` Dave Chinner
2019-10-22 6:00 ` Eric Biggers
2019-10-22 13:30 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-22 16:15 ` Eric Biggers
2019-10-23 9:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-23 12:57 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-24 1:27 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-10-24 2:44 ` Eric Biggers
2019-10-24 7:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-24 9:54 ` Paul Crowley
2019-10-23 9:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-21 23:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: add support for INLINE_CRYPT_OPTIMIZED encryption policies Eric Biggers
2019-10-22 13:37 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-22 16:37 ` Eric Biggers
2019-10-21 23:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: " Eric Biggers
2019-10-22 16:43 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191024012759.GA32358@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulcrowley@google.com \
--cc=paullawrence@google.com \
--cc=satyat@google.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).