linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_PERMISSIONERR
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:14:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191025101415.GL24678@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1107916.1571934467@turing-police>

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:27:47PM -0400, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 09:23:33 -0700, Joe Perches said:
> > On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 11:53 -0400, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
> 
> > >  	if (err) {
> > > -		if (err == FFS_PERMISSIONERR)
> > > +		if (err == -EPERM)
> > >  			err = -EPERM;
> > >  		else if (err == FFS_INVALIDPATH)
> > >  			err = -EINVAL;
> >
> > These test and assign to same value blocks look kinda silly.
> 
> One patch, one thing.  Those are getting cleaned up in a subsequent patch.:)

I was just giving an impromptu lecture on this last week....  The one
thing per patch means we cleanup the fallout that results from the
change.  So if you rename a function then you have re-indent the
parameters etc.  If you remove a cast from (type)(foo + bar) then
remove all the extra parentheses and so on.

(I don't have strong feelings about this patch, but I have just been
trying to explain the one thing rule recently).

regards,
dan carpenter


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-25 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-24 15:53 [PATCH 00/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 01/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_FULL Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 17:59   ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-10-24 18:39     ` Valdis Klētnieks
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 02/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_NOTFOUND Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 03/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_DIRBUSY Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 04/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_PERMISSIONERR Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 16:23   ` Joe Perches
2019-10-24 16:27     ` Valdis Klētnieks
2019-10-25 10:14       ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 05/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_NAMETOOLONG Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 06/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_FILEEXIST Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 07/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_INVALIDPATH Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 08/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return code - FFS_MEMORYERR Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 09/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_FORMATERR Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-25  2:56   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 10/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_MEDIAERR Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 11/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_EOF Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 12/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_INVALIDFID Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 13/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_ERROR Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 14/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - remove unused codes Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 15:53 ` [PATCH 15/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes - FFS_SUCCESS Valdis Kletnieks
2019-10-24 16:29   ` Joe Perches
2019-10-24 16:46     ` Valdis Klētnieks
2019-10-24 16:23 ` [PATCH 00/15] staging: exfat: Clean up return codes Joe Perches
2019-10-24 16:45   ` Valdis Klētnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191025101415.GL24678@kadam \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).