From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883ECCA9EC4 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 05:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EACD20659 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 05:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="msOZSol4" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732163AbfJ2FyC (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 01:54:02 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:51868 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726612AbfJ2FyC (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 01:54:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=e6RnrH2a/xpt2VMsLVKGZqzPeW9lRxkDro1R520eqQQ=; b=msOZSol4yz79J1fe4CsOfyuVj CNdbmyX/M4AxqpDVZGCsWG8UgR3sLsHZh6JfVG+GKO4uyHeKWQ1Ur5pFeXzU15bwsQOFkGvMfKbre bTdMpchI9RrZTKc0Mv16399xz+xAd06N/maT8aVXo+R8tyM7T5M8w4NVDZrvW34EfsuXuu1zVy6Sh pspzdWcGYgQDYZdgQwSj3qWIaagT8+HBedyFlVzGHfCqYKpWwbvkNQsYLAXvLE8muByumox6rzgDv 2EjwSMepzaDya+Kk2ImMAJyCuCUMVth9KhyJgMHd3z6N21itwWxAhGOIqzpWaZ6xiULoghzuiHTcD fUsb/qk1Q==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iPKS7-00084L-BP; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 05:53:59 +0000 Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:53:59 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Boaz Harrosh , linux-fsdevel , Miklos Szeredi , Alexander Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please add the zuf tree to linux-next Message-ID: <20191029055359.GA30787@infradead.org> References: <1b192a85-e1da-0925-ef26-178b93d0aa45@plexistor.com> <20191024023606.GA1884@infradead.org> <20191029160733.298c6539@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191029160733.298c6539@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 04:07:33PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Please add the zuf tree below to the linux-next tree. > > > [https://github.com/NetApp/zufs-zuf zuf] > > > > I don't remember us coming to the conclusion that this actually is > > useful doesn't just badly duplicate the fuse functionality. > > So is that a hard Nak on inclusion in linux-next at this time? As far as I'm concerned yes. In the end we'll need to find rough consensus as I'm not the only one to decide, though.