From: Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: jack@suse.cz, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] ext4: port direct I/O to iomap infrastructure
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 17:04:07 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191104060405.GA27115@bobrowski> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191103192040.GA12985@mit.edu>
Howdy Ted!
On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 02:20:40PM -0500, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> Hi Matthew, could you do me a favor? For the next (and hopefully
> final :-) spin of this patch series, could you base it on the
> ext4.git's master branch. Then pull in Darrick's iomap-for-next
> branch, and then apply your patches on top of that.
>
> I attempted to do this with the v6 patch series --- see the tt/mb-dio
> branch --- and I described on another e-mail thread, I appear to have
> screwed up that patch conflicts, since it's causing a failure with
> diroead-nolock using a 1k block size. Since this wasn't something
> that worked when you were first working on the patch set, this isn't
> something I'm going to consider blocking, especially since a flay test
> failure which happens 7% of the time, and using dioread_nolock with a
> sub-page blocksize isn't something that is going to be all that common
> (since it wasn't working at all up until now).
>
> Still, I'm hoping that either Ritesh or you can figure out how my
> simple-minded handling of the patch conflict between your and his
> patch series can be addressed properly.
OK, I will try get around to this tonight. :)
--<M>--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-04 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-28 10:50 [PATCH v6 00/11] ext4: port direct I/O to iomap infrastructure Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-28 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] ext4: reorder map.m_flags checks within ext4_iomap_begin() Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-28 10:50 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] ext4: update direct I/O read lock pattern for IOCB_NOWAIT Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-28 10:51 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] ext4: iomap that extends beyond EOF should be marked dirty Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-28 10:51 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] ext4: move set iomap routines into a separate helper ext4_set_iomap() Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-28 17:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-28 20:36 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-28 23:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-10-28 10:51 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] ext4: split IOMAP_WRITE branch in ext4_iomap_begin() into helper Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-28 10:52 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] ext4: introduce new callback for IOMAP_REPORT Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-29 5:42 ` Ritesh Harjani
2019-10-28 10:52 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] ext4: introduce direct I/O read using iomap infrastructure Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-28 10:52 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] ext4: move inode extension/truncate code out from ->iomap_end() callback Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-29 5:46 ` Ritesh Harjani
2019-10-28 10:53 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] ext4: move inode extension check out from ext4_iomap_alloc() Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-28 10:53 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] ext4: introduce direct I/O write using iomap infrastructure Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-29 6:14 ` Ritesh Harjani
2019-10-28 10:53 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] ext4: update ext4_sync_file() to not use __generic_file_fsync() Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-29 6:12 ` Ritesh Harjani
2019-10-30 11:18 ` Jan Kara
2019-10-29 23:31 ` [PATCH v6 00/11] ext4: port direct I/O to iomap infrastructure Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-29 23:34 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-30 2:00 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-30 11:26 ` Jan Kara
2019-10-30 11:39 ` Jan Kara
2019-10-31 9:16 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-10-31 16:54 ` Jan Kara
2019-10-31 22:58 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-11-03 19:20 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-11-04 6:04 ` Matthew Bobrowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191104060405.GA27115@bobrowski \
--to=mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).