From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5258EC43215 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFDF205C9 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="hlR76+Re" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726983AbfKOIqq (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 03:46:46 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:52074 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725829AbfKOIqp (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 03:46:45 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0CC300B4C5AF24BE56B25A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0c:c300:b4c5:af24:be56:b25a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id BD0131EC0D02; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:46:43 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1573807603; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=gzm0MsATgUeRf/cV4H3chmTT5kcyvLvkgX8Ha1pOZg4=; b=hlR76+RevqugKg4NnWt0MSY1yG3p7Yzg4h0iZWDTl315fdJlRF38T83a4HXKzwNnW+njDH My/PGVzkzqQaorJaVDDjc22AuoizeM+yazbhgzR78R2sUOUTw/JW7eo6CdeX+k5SiYCJ9I 7muzQIQe8j2aCDXsEYgJS0oIzE31kO8= Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:46:43 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Chen Yu Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Will Deacon , Fenghua Yu , Reinette Chatre , Tony Luck , Andrew Morton , Alexey Dobriyan , Michal Hocko , Kees Cook , Christian Brauner , Shakeel Butt , Casey Schaufler , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Kent Overstreet , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][v2] resctrl: Add CPU_RESCTRL Message-ID: <20191115084643.GE18929@zn.tnic> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 01:24:20PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote: > Introduce a generic option called CPU_RESCTRL which > is selected by the arch-specific ones CONFIG_X86_RESCTRL > or CONFIG_ARM64_RESCTRL in the future. The generic one will > cover the resctrl filesystem and other generic and shared > bits of functionality. > > Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov I don't remember suggesting adding a separate CONFIG option... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette