From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
"Ernesto A . Fernndez" <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Hin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net>,
Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 161/237] fs/hfs/extent.c: fix array out of bounds read of array extent
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 10:39:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191116154113.7417-161-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191116154113.7417-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
[ Upstream commit 6c9a3f843a29d6894dfc40df338b91dbd78f0ae3 ]
Currently extent and index i are both being incremented causing an array
out of bounds read on extent[i]. Fix this by removing the extraneous
increment of extent.
Ernesto said:
: This is only triggered when deleting a file with a resource fork. I
: may be wrong because the documentation isn't clear, but I don't think
: you can create those under linux. So I guess nobody was testing them.
:
: > A disk space leak, perhaps?
:
: That's what it looks like in general. hfs_free_extents() won't do
: anything if the block count doesn't add up, and the error will be
: ignored. Now, if the block count randomly does add up, we could see
: some corruption.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#711541 ("Out of bounds read")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180831140538.31566-1-colin.king@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Ernesto A. Fernndez <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Hin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/hfs/extent.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/hfs/extent.c b/fs/hfs/extent.c
index 5f1ff97a3b987..263d5028d9d18 100644
--- a/fs/hfs/extent.c
+++ b/fs/hfs/extent.c
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ int hfs_free_fork(struct super_block *sb, struct hfs_cat_file *file, int type)
return 0;
blocks = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < 3; extent++, i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
blocks += be16_to_cpu(extent[i].count);
res = hfs_free_extents(sb, extent, blocks, blocks);
--
2.20.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-16 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20191116154113.7417-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2019-11-16 15:39 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 120/237] selftests: fix warning: "_GNU_SOURCE" redefined Sasha Levin
2019-11-16 15:39 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 141/237] vfs: avoid problematic remapping requests into partial EOF block Sasha Levin
2019-11-16 15:39 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 153/237] hfsplus: fix BUG on bnode parent update Sasha Levin
2019-11-16 15:39 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 154/237] hfs: " Sasha Levin
2019-11-16 15:39 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 155/237] hfsplus: prevent btree data loss on ENOSPC Sasha Levin
2019-11-16 15:39 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 156/237] hfs: " Sasha Levin
2019-11-16 15:39 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 157/237] hfsplus: fix return value of hfsplus_get_block() Sasha Levin
2019-11-16 15:39 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 158/237] hfs: fix return value of hfs_get_block() Sasha Levin
2019-11-16 15:39 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 159/237] hfsplus: update timestamps on truncate() Sasha Levin
2019-11-16 15:39 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 160/237] hfs: update timestamp " Sasha Levin
2019-11-16 15:39 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191116154113.7417-161-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com \
--cc=htl10@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).