From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
To: jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org,
riteshh@linux.ibm.com, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCHv4 3/3] ext4: Move to shared i_rwsem even without dioread_nolock mount opt
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 19:16:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191205134605.2593-1-riteshh@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191205120529.GB32639@quack2.suse.cz>
We were using shared locking only in case of dioread_nolock mount option in case
of DIO overwrites. This mount condition is not needed anymore with current code,
since:-
1. No race between buffered writes & DIO overwrites. Since buffIO writes takes
exclusive lock & DIO overwrites will take shared locking. Also DIO path will
make sure to flush and wait for any dirty page cache data.
2. No race between buffered reads & DIO overwrites, since there is no block
allocation that is possible with DIO overwrites. So no stale data exposure
should happen. Same is the case between DIO reads & DIO overwrites.
3. Also other paths like truncate is protected, since we wait there for any DIO
in flight to be over.
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
---
fs/ext4/file.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
index cbafaec9e4fc..682ed956eb02 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/file.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
@@ -392,8 +392,8 @@ static const struct iomap_dio_ops ext4_dio_write_ops = {
* - For extending writes case we don't take the shared lock, since it requires
* updating inode i_disksize and/or orphan handling with exclusive lock.
*
- * - shared locking will only be true mostly with overwrites in dioread_nolock
- * mode. Otherwise we will switch to exclusive i_rwsem lock.
+ * - shared locking will only be true mostly with overwrites. Otherwise we will
+ * switch to exclusive i_rwsem lock.
*/
static ssize_t ext4_dio_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from,
bool *ilock_shared, bool *extend)
@@ -415,14 +415,11 @@ static ssize_t ext4_dio_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from,
*extend = true;
/*
* Determine whether the IO operation will overwrite allocated
- * and initialized blocks. If so, check to see whether it is
- * possible to take the dioread_nolock path.
- *
+ * and initialized blocks.
* We need exclusive i_rwsem for changing security info
* in file_modified().
*/
if (*ilock_shared && (!IS_NOSEC(inode) || *extend ||
- !ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode) ||
!ext4_overwrite_io(inode, offset, count))) {
inode_unlock_shared(inode);
*ilock_shared = false;
--
2.21.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-05 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-05 6:46 [PATCHv4 0/3] Fix inode_lock sequence to scale performance of DIO mixed R/W workload Ritesh Harjani
2019-12-05 6:46 ` [PATCHv4 1/3] ext4: fix ext4_dax_read/write inode locking sequence for IOCB_NOWAIT Ritesh Harjani
2019-12-05 6:46 ` [PATCHv4 2/3] ext4: Start with shared i_rwsem in case of DIO instead of exclusive Ritesh Harjani
2019-12-05 12:03 ` Jan Kara
2019-12-05 13:40 ` Ritesh Harjani
2019-12-05 6:46 ` [PATCHv4 3/3] ext4: Move to shared i_rwsem even without dioread_nolock mount opt Ritesh Harjani
2019-12-05 12:05 ` Jan Kara
2019-12-05 13:41 ` Ritesh Harjani
2019-12-05 13:46 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2019-12-06 8:46 ` [PATCHv4 0/3] Fix inode_lock sequence to scale performance of DIO mixed R/W workload Joseph Qi
2019-12-06 8:49 ` Ritesh Harjani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191205134605.2593-1-riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--to=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).