linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Jeremi Piotrowski <jeremi.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: Don't reject unknown parameters
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:46:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191217174652.GB4203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegv_zY6w6=pOL0x=sjuQmGae0ymOafZXjyAdNEHj+EKyNA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:15:03AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

> Just need a flag in fc indicating if this option comes from the old interface:
> 
>          if (strcmp(param->key, "source") == 0)
>                  return -ENOPARAM;
>          /* Just log an error for backwards compatibility */
>          errorf(fc, "%s: Unknown parameter '%s'", fc->fs_type->name,
> param->key);
>          return fc->legacy ? 0 : -ENOPARAM;

	What the hell for?  Just have a separate ->parse_param() instance
for "promiscuous fs, will accept bullshit options" and have such filesystems
use it explicitly.  With default being not that, but rejecting unknowns.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-17 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-12 14:50 [PATCH] vfs: Don't reject unknown parameters Laura Abbott
2019-12-12 17:13 ` Ilya Dryomov
2019-12-12 17:47   ` Laura Abbott
2019-12-12 17:56     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12 20:01       ` Laura Abbott
2019-12-12 21:36         ` Al Viro
2019-12-13  9:15           ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-12-13  9:30             ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-12-17 17:46             ` Al Viro [this message]
2019-12-17 17:49           ` David Howells
2019-12-17 18:08             ` Miklos Szeredi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191217174652.GB4203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeremi.piotrowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=phillip@squashfs.org.uk \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).