From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157F4C282DD for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA082067D for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729319AbgAHSqZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jan 2020 13:46:25 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:50726 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729226AbgAHSqU (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jan 2020 13:46:20 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 8420B68CEC; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 19:46:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 19:46:16 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= Cc: Markus Elfring , Namjae Jeon , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sungjong Seo , Valdis =?utf-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , linkinjeon@gmail.com Subject: Re: [v8 08/13] exfat: add exfat cache Message-ID: <20200108184616.GA15429@lst.de> References: <20200108180819.3gt6ihm4w2haustn@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200108180819.3gt6ihm4w2haustn@pali> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 07:08:19PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Thursday 02 January 2020 11:19:26 Markus Elfring wrote: > > > I am planning to change to share stuff included cache with fat after > > > exfat upstream. > > > > Can unwanted code duplication be avoided before? > > +1 Could it be possible? Let's defer that until we have the code upstream. Getting rid of the staging version and having proper upstream exfat support should be a priority for now, especially as sharing will involve coordination with multiple maintainers. If it works out nicely I'm all for it, though!