From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8285FC282DD for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:54:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4CC2072A for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:54:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chrisdown.name header.i=@chrisdown.name header.b="V6FQkdls" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731873AbgAIOx7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 09:53:59 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com ([209.85.128.50]:54854 "EHLO mail-wm1-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730123AbgAIOx6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 09:53:58 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id b19so3228682wmj.4 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:53:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chrisdown.name; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=rUxPHa2T/qhjfPbBGgKT0jw2Pzfyyz7G8V70ESCMcRw=; b=V6FQkdls3RdCEqF/mu2mah0JUBnQeCeA2/rmb4KqnquLCXhwFabSCLIUAtoGpGytTu hs37ORj+RgTBBs6BP0kEDsoaqi7d1zj01UB5OvxuJKUmulPxpZmXE5S6BEcYsUxzp6hn 17Z+yZ1Kw/5ysSD5DVe7CvuGiTqVJjmXixcog= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=rUxPHa2T/qhjfPbBGgKT0jw2Pzfyyz7G8V70ESCMcRw=; b=NYzeje7Z59JJIYA0w8gccD6UH8a1XqQYIHKmVIITOsFCWm2tDJYi0Y5TScer8M3/Nk Suta0oryIcCvucDaJ8ckC3Rvx2C/dnEFXGxFqfK801Och+4y5B/u1NCFT73TFRBEo43g yVgy5JgY6bnkCTP+yC4mD5OTU9rEvoMOTaMsW4TGpixpj+XP7juzAcpZGpgY0+MeepGN o/PFykCPnWWbj3rH4UFudFZ+OvxwrzGDriey9upCguLO6q/l+TQYIqb5UgMjLQCjLIiD J9DSw1KfpEIHP+vzopde5/h/x8B2FGvXgMgQyCT4Kg72UVCArGo3I6ZeRfuZnJ4Sfu0z rUhg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUB9BkYvYbLkojAhRWWPfg9Bq/Mzxh+dPQDyPD8HN01qSrLsbsL aanlnxBk4iWbG/5DtRTvgqFswg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzq0xB087gtDch3VgcD10JC1IwNoOD11dTRRE2inBUSxt3yaAvEH7p8AntjfBQlsiOZ0U8ijA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2207:: with SMTP id z7mr5240117wml.138.1578581636799; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:53:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c092:200::1:37ce]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p7sm2966892wmp.31.2020.01.09.06.53.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Jan 2020 06:53:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 14:53:55 +0000 From: Chris Down To: Chen Yu Cc: x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , Reinette Chatre , Fenghua Yu , Tony Luck , Michal Hocko , Linus Torvalds , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND v5] x86/resctrl: Add task resctrl information display Message-ID: <20200109145355.GC61542@chrisdown.name> References: <20200109135001.10076-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200109135001.10076-1-yu.c.chen@intel.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Chen Yu writes: >+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_CPU_RESCTRL >+ ONE("resctrl", S_IRUGO, proc_resctrl_show), There was already some discussion about "resctrl" by itself being a misleading name, hence why the CONFIG option eventually became CONFIG_X86_CPU_RESCTRL. Can you please rethink the name of this /proc file, and have it at least be "cpu_resctrl" or "x86_resctrl" or similar? :-)