From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE41C33CA4 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 17:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AF020882 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 17:57:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1578765479; bh=5vqrRTSv0UYc63jQmXzDlf5c/h7W9lj6SrJ/3ve1hNE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=VhZgdQBZwig5Uz9L1fSmAPnaPQe/OlOb8yWKONKu8Iukn0SjoyMUG0W6hA9047w99 XrS8cTX3ydIAFNIRxzUSej1Ua2q5nzt83t0vo7vbLRcmHjRj8uHVOU1WAkaXu8i+WB OIukleyiJyvvBVA7BT9Gis2u/ryNh1oj0llS/iD0= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730416AbgAKR5y (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jan 2020 12:57:54 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:52334 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729957AbgAKR5y (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jan 2020 12:57:54 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [84.241.193.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49C4E2084D; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 17:57:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1578765473; bh=5vqrRTSv0UYc63jQmXzDlf5c/h7W9lj6SrJ/3ve1hNE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UCQd+LNRA2rTKFb0Iz2vL6HS97FsW+9BRT+M9KcxS7WCLus5MUCqFtxJrXnD5uKH/ FE+7zeohS0Mkyc9tQkOnXY9ZRCuKcAqStKN3YpLYjnlRTDlfYuoDrTMmpIg8pQP4T8 OHTQXMtUyeyPAoQKzxd1bfePyxmOaL4dksaZlC4c= Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 18:56:11 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Namjae Jeon Cc: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Namjae Jeon , amir73il@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: make staging/exfat and fs/exfat mutually exclusive Message-ID: <20200111175611.GA422540@kroah.com> References: <20200111121419.22669-1-linkinjeon@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200111121419.22669-1-linkinjeon@gmail.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 09:14:19PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote: > From: Namjae Jeon > > Make staging/exfat and fs/exfat mutually exclusive to select the one > between two same filesystem. > > Suggested-by: Amir Goldstein > Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon > --- > drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig > index 292a19dfcaf5..9a0fccec65d9 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > config STAGING_EXFAT_FS > tristate "exFAT fs support" > - depends on BLOCK > + depends on BLOCK && !EXFAT_FS There is no such symbol in the kernel tree, so this isn't going to do anything :( When/if EXFAT_FS does show up, I will be glad to add this. Or better yet, just have this as part of the "real" exfat patchset, that would make the most sense, right? thanks, greg k-h