linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] fanotify: fix merging marks masks with FAN_ONDIR
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:16:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200114151655.29473-7-amir73il@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114151655.29473-1-amir73il@gmail.com>

Change the logic of FAN_ONDIR in two ways that are similar to the logic
of FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD, that was fixed in commit 54a307ba8d3c ("fanotify:
fix logic of events on child"):

1. The flag is meaningless in ignore mask
2. The flag refers only to events in the mask of the mark where it is set

This is what the fanotify_mark.2 man page says about FAN_ONDIR:
"Without this flag, only events for files are created."  It doesn't
say anything about setting this flag in ignore mask to stop getting
events on directories nor can I think of any setup where this capability
would be useful.

Currently, when marks masks are merged, the FAN_ONDIR flag set in one
mark affects the events that are set in another mark's mask and this
behavior causes unexpected results.  For example, a user adds a mark on a
directory with mask FAN_ATTRIB | FAN_ONDIR and a mount mark with mask
FAN_OPEN (without FAN_ONDIR).  An opendir() of that directory (which is
inside that mount) generates a FAN_OPEN event even though neither of the
marks requested to get open events on directories.

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
---
 fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
index 2ae82040f26f..a98ee4340eaa 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
@@ -171,6 +171,13 @@ static u32 fanotify_group_event_mask(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 		if (!fsnotify_iter_should_report_type(iter_info, type))
 			continue;
 		mark = iter_info->marks[type];
+		/*
+		 * If the event is on dir and this mark doesn't care about
+		 * events on dir, don't send it!
+		 */
+		if (event_mask & FS_ISDIR && !(mark->mask & FS_ISDIR))
+			continue;
+
 		/*
 		 * If the event is for a child and this mark doesn't care about
 		 * events on a child, don't send it!
@@ -203,10 +210,6 @@ static u32 fanotify_group_event_mask(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 		user_mask &= ~FAN_ONDIR;
 	}
 
-	if (event_mask & FS_ISDIR &&
-	    !(marks_mask & FS_ISDIR & ~marks_ignored_mask))
-		return 0;
-
 	return test_mask & user_mask;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-14 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-14 15:16 [PATCH 0/6] Prepare for fanotify name events Amir Goldstein
2020-01-14 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] fsnotify: tidy up FS_ and FAN_ constants Amir Goldstein
2020-01-14 15:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] fsnotify: pass dentry instead of inode for events possible on child Amir Goldstein
2020-01-14 15:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] fsnotify: simplify arguments passing to fsnotify_parent() Amir Goldstein
2020-01-14 15:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] fsnotify: replace inode pointer with tag Amir Goldstein
2020-01-14 15:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] fanotify: merge duplicate events on parent and child Amir Goldstein
2020-01-14 15:16 ` Amir Goldstein [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200114151655.29473-7-amir73il@gmail.com \
    --to=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).