linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
	"amir73il@gmail.com" <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
	<lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"miklos@szeredi.hu" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Allowing linkat() to replace the destination
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 02:20:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200118022032.GR8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200118011734.GD295250@vader>

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 05:17:34PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > No.  This is completely wrong; just make it ->link_replace() and be done
> > with that; no extra arguments and *always* the same conditions wrt
> > positive/negative.  One of the reasons why ->rename() tends to be
> > ugly (and a source of quite a few bugs over years) are those "if
> > target is positive/if target is negative" scattered over the instances.
> > 
> > Make the choice conditional upon the positivity of target.
> 
> Yup, you already convinced me that ->link_replace() is better in your
> last email.

FWIW, that might be not so simple ;-/  Reason: NFS-like stuff.  Client
sees a negative in cache; the problem is how to decide whether to
tell the server "OK, I want normal link()" vs. "if it turns out that
someone has created it by the time you see the request, give do
a replacing link".  Sure, if could treat ->link() telling you -EEXIST
as "OK, repeat it with ->link_replace(), then", but that's an extra
roundtrip...

Hell knows...  I would really like to avoid any kind of ->atomic_open()
redux ;-/

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-18  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-17 12:49 [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Allowing linkat() to replace the destination David Howells
2020-01-17 14:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-17 15:46   ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 16:12     ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-17 16:48       ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 16:36     ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-17 16:59       ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 17:28         ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-17 18:17           ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 20:22             ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-17 22:22               ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 23:54                 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-18  0:47                   ` Al Viro
2020-01-18  1:17                     ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-18  2:20                       ` Al Viro [this message]
2020-01-21 23:05                         ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-22  6:57                           ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-22 22:10                             ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-23  3:47                               ` Al Viro
2020-01-23  7:16                                 ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:47                                   ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-24 21:25                                     ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-31  5:24                                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-31  5:29                                         ` hch
2020-01-31  7:00                                         ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-31 20:33                                           ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-31 21:55                                             ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-28  1:27                                   ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-28 14:35                                 ` David Howells
2020-01-31  5:31                                   ` hch
2020-01-31  8:04                                   ` David Howells
2020-01-31  8:56                                     ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-22  9:53                       ` David Howells
2020-01-17 14:47 ` David Howells
2020-01-17 14:56   ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-17 16:01     ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200118022032.GR8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).