From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
jack@suse.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext2, possible circular locking dependency detected
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:02:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200224130219.GE27857@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24689.1582538536@jrobl>
On Mon 24-02-20 19:02:16, J. R. Okajima wrote:
> Jan Kara:
> > This is not the right way how memalloc_nofs_save() should be used (you
> > could just use GFP_NOFS instead of GFP_KERNEL instead of wrapping the
> > allocation inside memalloc_nofs_save/restore()). The
> > memalloc_nofs_save/restore() API is created so that you can change the
> > allocation context at the place which mandates the new context - i.e., in
> > this case when acquiring / dropping xattr_sem. That way you don't have to
> > propagate the context information down to function calls and the code is
> > also future-proof - if you add new allocation, they will use correct
> > allocation context.
>
> Thanks for the lecture about memalloc_nofs_save/restore().
> Honestly speaking, I didn't know these APIs and I always use GFP_NOFS
> flag. Investigating this lockdep warning, I read the comments in gfp.h.
>
> * %GFP_NOFS will use direct reclaim but will not use any filesystem interfaces.
> * Please try to avoid using this flag directly and instead use
> * memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} to mark the whole scope which cannot/shouldn't
> * recurse into the FS layer with a short explanation why. All allocation
> * requests will inherit GFP_NOFS implicitly.
>
> Actually grep-ping the whole kernel source tree told me there are
> several "one-liners" like ...nofs_save(); kmalloc(); ...nofs_restore
> sequence. But re-reading the comments and your mail, I understand these
> APIs are for much wider region than such one-liner.
>
> I don't think it a good idea that I send you another patch replaced by
> GFP_NOFS. You can fix it simply and you know much more than me about
> this matter, and I will be satisfied when this problem is fixed by you.
OK, in the end I've decided to go with a different solution because I
realized the warning is a false positive one. The patch has passed a
fstests run but I'd be grateful if you could verify whether you can no longer
trigger the lockdep warning. Thanks!
Honza
PS: I've posted the patch separately to the list.
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-24 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-22 2:53 ext2, possible circular locking dependency detected J. R. Okajima
2020-02-24 9:08 ` Jan Kara
2020-02-24 10:02 ` J. R. Okajima
2020-02-24 13:02 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2020-02-24 15:11 ` J. R. Okajima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200224130219.GE27857@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=hooanon05g@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).