From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89682C4BA0A for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD63206E2 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="QVngWJph" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726947AbgBZFti (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:49:38 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f193.google.com ([209.85.214.193]:43389 "EHLO mail-pl1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725789AbgBZFti (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:49:38 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f193.google.com with SMTP id p11so828361plq.10 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:49:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=+o0Cxx8HmQdXWrejhdC3RH6moiQGlThNZB33TEB2/R0=; b=QVngWJphiEqTsggSbaGZG6KKVe/5xdUUs9fF1c8wpFIBC85uu6w0X4OjARiK7hiHsy YirmKlA8+5ufTIQVNnhu+cRiDjjkVNg+kDVeOmLSZcaJcnc/+CklCyb23K9XK4TexOyP w+JOHDZPBRFCgI7qgLAo6vpCvdZb8ga/AW3GI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=+o0Cxx8HmQdXWrejhdC3RH6moiQGlThNZB33TEB2/R0=; b=JGKGCEBojq5ocuL05o5jAxAjgUhpDPsnHqzh2FPZ5LZTuT1AXqBCnQi2TvqrxA3STz of5YyrPBH6Q6A+FB8kdhl8se2iUwa3fbUPpYHIPNAGvXyN5/36VbF0fMILnySWc7hZfB h7b2tG5qGj/8ZskDdp4q3SLJ7sqqrNJQpwoOBZTPlHqL9bG/PngW9cRcZEZQrBtIMzSx cN/DHOYBj8qLDsSxOoGoaltBQn+E3+ZzELD9ba5JyluiDsXCtYrqEhzEuAcT/aVZd8/Z ihE7OZWc2MYx1JGaLcQMI3Z0/v2a9n8L1GNRqq3klnQ2pg//yxHGXZDcMrJYariIxu9W xOtg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXghyGS38PSDiuzu56a1+RiMJheFs4d3Cx1Nl1jZeLYJWznK1y4 CzYEHUI9sFAwAVzRWBZW5zpDUg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx8Hr/Cj5VybYqFNkztZ4OEH69rhUqXd7K5EOJh00EissLfKhJ2zFA3IUzdAa6QW4zPXy4nZg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6ac7:: with SMTP id i7mr2245702plt.314.1582696177733; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:49:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q6sm1057628pfh.127.2020.02.25.21.49.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:49:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 21:49:35 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Alexander Viro , Paul Elliott , Peter Zijlstra , Yu-cheng Yu , Amit Kachhap , Vincenzo Frascino , Marc Zyngier , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Szabolcs Nagy , "H . J . Lu " , Andrew Jones , Arnd Bergmann , Jann Horn , Richard Henderson , Kristina =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C5=A1enko?= , Thomas Gleixner , Florian Weimer , Sudakshina Das , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Martin Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/11] ELF: UAPI and Kconfig additions for ELF program properties Message-ID: <202002252147.7BFF9EE@keescook> References: <20200212192906.53366-1-broonie@kernel.org> <20200212192906.53366-2-broonie@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200212192906.53366-2-broonie@kernel.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 07:28:56PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > From: Dave Martin > > Pull the basic ELF definitions relating to the > NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note from Yu-Cheng Yu's earlier x86 shstk > series. Both BTI and SHSTK depend on this. If BTI doesn't land soon, can this and patch 2 land separately? I don't like seeing the older version in the SHSTK series -- I worry there will be confusion and the BTI version (which is more up to date) will get missed. What's left to land BTI support? -- Kees Cook