From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Xi Wang <xii@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: watchdog: Touch kernel watchdog in sched code
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 22:11:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200304221123.7cef48d7@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200304213941.112303-1-xii@google.com>
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 13:39:41 -0800
Xi Wang <xii@google.com> wrote:
> The main purpose of kernel watchdog is to test whether scheduler can
> still schedule tasks on a cpu. In order to reduce latency from
> periodically invoking watchdog reset in thread context, we can simply
> touch watchdog from pick_next_task in scheduler. Compared to actually
> resetting watchdog from cpu stop / migration threads, we lose coverage
> on: a migration thread actually get picked and we actually context
> switch to the migration thread. Both steps are heavily protected by
> kernel locks and unlikely to silently fail. Thus the change would
> provide the same level of protection with less overhead.
Have any measurements showing the drop in overhead?
>
> The new way vs the old way to touch the watchdogs is configurable
> from:
>
> /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_touch_in_thread_interval
>
> The value means:
> 0: Always touch watchdog from pick_next_task
> 1: Always touch watchdog from migration thread
> N (N>0): Touch watchdog from migration thread once in every N
> invocations, and touch watchdog from pick_next_task for
> other invocations.
>
> Suggested-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xii@google.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> kernel/sysctl.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> kernel/watchdog.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 1a9983da4408..9d8e00760d1c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3898,6 +3898,27 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev, bool preempt)
> schedstat_inc(this_rq()->sched_count);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> +
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, sched_should_touch_watchdog);
> +
> +void touch_watchdog_from_sched(void);
> +
> +/* Helper called by watchdog code */
> +void resched_for_watchdog(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> +
> + this_cpu_write(sched_should_touch_watchdog, true);
Perhaps we should have a preempt_disable, otherwise it is possible
to get preempted here.
-- Steve
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
> + /* Trigger resched for code in pick_next_task to touch watchdog */
> + resched_curr(rq);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR */
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-05 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-04 21:39 [PATCH] sched: watchdog: Touch kernel watchdog in sched code Xi Wang
2020-03-05 3:11 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-03-05 7:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-05 18:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-05 21:41 ` Xi Wang
2020-03-05 22:07 ` Paul Turner
[not found] ` <CAOBoifgHNag0P33PKg81iNoCjxenJHfBZG-t-8aEkr_Tjf7o_w@mail.gmail.com>
2020-03-06 8:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-05 22:11 ` Paul Turner
2020-03-06 8:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-06 22:34 ` Xi Wang
2020-10-05 11:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-06 2:21 ` Xi Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200304221123.7cef48d7@oasis.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=xii@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).