From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C036C2BB1D for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 01:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F43E206EC for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 01:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="cJRp34yq" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727234AbgCRBzy (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 21:55:54 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:49866 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726871AbgCRBzy (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 21:55:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=n8WaT2pi8h8ZeSpbZU79nxS0PDKpvFIPkib3B7Iy9xo=; b=cJRp34yqma1tSdCdEvUG3RzlW+ nYLQAuW3ut+cPDQT+qgwMH9B8XbF05HmlF14rbg3fUUYk+O0ZJwkP3tlXZpu8S2UZjegPSJ/4UxlK yLesmu14kWTCCKYD1hwqoRlAb9Ru3e0iH+O/w2itPRsUDQZafc+BOPH9KXjd8pSJ8UhSdeWynFbw3 aHG6M/3uBRhFh/vPgfyOq18gbUT2WgYr5kOsDBCeesBvlJ0azDAltFrgIRw3/OZxg0soJasZBJIbf C+iaRvCIMEomV+Eijyw4GyrvMZHD4VnF6PDmQhOC0zQ0rUgI+gkpMik1Q9F2QIlInRiWDo2dwdWmE pjL8taDA==; Received: from willy by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jENw2-0004mi-1j; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 01:55:54 +0000 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:55:53 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Vitor Massaru Iha Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xarray: Add missing blank line after declaration Message-ID: <20200318015553.GG22433@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <7efa62f727eb176341fc0cdfcd47c890ff424451.1584494902.git.vitor@massaru.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7efa62f727eb176341fc0cdfcd47c890ff424451.1584494902.git.vitor@massaru.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:43:03PM -0300, Vitor Massaru Iha wrote: > @@ -1624,6 +1624,7 @@ static inline unsigned int xas_find_chunk(struct xa_state *xas, bool advance, > if (XA_CHUNK_SIZE == BITS_PER_LONG) { > if (offset < XA_CHUNK_SIZE) { > unsigned long data = *addr & (~0UL << offset); > + > if (data) > return __ffs(data); > } Do you seriously think this makes the function in any way more legible?