From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CFEC5ACD8 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 14:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE0E20776 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 14:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="q/07svVZ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726832AbgCROq3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 10:46:29 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:49136 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726308AbgCROq3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2020 10:46:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=22sVcNbDCzARdRFC3MRVT7FnYchnm76kK5yHdzlXjIo=; b=q/07svVZajs+gu/v8igGPgZbpb cYjBvKo/McnsG3YrnLst9dR2GjXqaL0a2ed/uPoTg/5TQn1WJxmgpbCzTTTDzqvJSHC66CkhyuV1X b/ctGrv+vfF6KzNjM+rG2j9oeXvuTI+hYB6CeQ6jV/bJRHppOIhH1rMPAZFXxNH4WaNQ93eaNDtU4 PwRxwv9zUJEluh1weB8o8khCCmCZ1gIUM9prZbpDo81X2M13utKut4SHAuzza2cQQap6eGCqEKNgU IpfQeocX61rd+wD0zxCQZS8rIbTFUITytw9uuA8k3BmHt4idJqeqXpzQ9kRbMvyBkPH1Tygt1VpPE OiS+5sHw==; Received: from willy by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jEZxk-0002I7-NA; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 14:46:28 +0000 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 07:46:28 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , Dmitry Monakhov Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/namespace: handle mount(MS_BIND|MS_REMOUNT) without locking sb->s_umount Message-ID: <20200318144628.GI22433@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <158454107541.4470.14819321770893756073.stgit@buzz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <158454107541.4470.14819321770893756073.stgit@buzz> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 05:17:55PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > @@ -459,11 +459,11 @@ void mnt_drop_write_file(struct file *file) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(mnt_drop_write_file); > > +/* mount_lock must be held */ > static int mnt_make_readonly(struct mount *mnt) > { > int ret = 0; > > - lock_mount_hash(); I'd rather see + lockdep_assert_held_write(&mount_lock); than a comment. Maybe wrapped up into a macro like assert_hash_locked().