From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: Do not use GFP_NORETRY to allocate BIOs
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:10:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200323151054.GI4971@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200323135500.GA14335@infradead.org>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 06:55:00AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 06:40:32AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Oh, I see that now. It uses readahead_gfp_mask(), and I was grepping for
> > GFP_NORETRY so I didn't spot it. It falls back to block_read_full_page()
> > which we can't do. That will allocate smaller BIOs, so there's an argument
> > that we should do the same. How about this:
>
> That looks silly to me. This just means we'll keep iterating over
> small bios for readahead.. Either we just ignore the different gfp
> mask, or we need to go all the way and handle errors, although that
> doesn't really look nice.
I'm not sure it's silly, although I'd love to see bio_alloc() support
nr_iovecs == 0 meaning "allocate me any size biovec and tell me what
size I got in ->bi_max_vecs". By allocating a small biovec this time,
we do one allocation rather than two, and maybe by the time we come to
allocate the next readahead bio, kswapd will have succeeded in freeing
up more memory for us.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-23 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-23 13:12 [PATCH] iomap: Do not use GFP_NORETRY to allocate BIOs Matthew Wilcox
2020-03-23 13:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-23 13:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-03-23 13:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-23 15:10 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-03-23 16:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-31 9:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-23 15:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200323151054.GI4971@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).