From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=x5/O=5Z=vger.kernel.org=linux-fsdevel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61221C2BB85
	for <linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu,  9 Apr 2020 16:54:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE7620753
	for <linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu,  9 Apr 2020 16:54:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1728177AbgDIQys (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:54:48 -0400
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:51172 "EHLO
        ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1727041AbgDIQyr (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:54:47 -0400
Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux))
        id 1jMaRy-00FItN-BQ; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 16:54:46 +0000
Date:   Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:54:46 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc:     Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] proc/mounts: add cursor
Message-ID: <20200409165446.GF23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20200409141619.GF28467@miu.piliscsaba.redhat.com>
 <20200409165048.GE23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200409165048.GE23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 05:50:48PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 04:16:19PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > Solve this by adding a cursor entry for each open instance.  Taking the
> > global namespace_sem for write seems excessive, since we are only dealing
> > with a per-namespace list.  Instead add a per-namespace spinlock and use
> > that together with namespace_sem taken for read to protect against
> > concurrent modification of the mount list.  This may reduce parallelism of
> > is_local_mountpoint(), but it's hardly a big contention point.  We could
> > also use RCU freeing of cursors to make traversal not need additional
> > locks, if that turns out to be neceesary.
> 
> Umm...  That can do more than reduction of parallelism - longer lists take
> longer to scan and moving cursors dirties cachelines in a bunch of struct
> mount instances.  And I'm not convinced that your locking in m_next() is
> correct.
> 
> What's to stop umount_tree() from removing the next entry from the list
> just as your m_next() tries to move the cursor?  I don't see any common
> locks for those two...

Ah, you still have namespace_sem taken (shared) by m_start().  Nevermind
that one, then...  Let me get through mnt_list users and see if I can
catch anything.