linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, ming.lei@redhat.com,
	nstange@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mhocko@suse.com, yukuai3@huawei.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC v2 4/5] mm/swapfile: refcount block and queue before using blkcg_schedule_throttle()
Date: Thu,  9 Apr 2020 21:45:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200409214530.2413-5-mcgrof@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200409214530.2413-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>

block device are refcounted so to ensure once its final user goes away it
can be cleaned up by the lower layers properly. The block device's
request_queue structure is also refcounted, however if the last
blk_put_queue() is called under atomic context the block layer has
to defer removal.

By refcounting the block device during the use of blkcg_schedule_throttle(),
we ensure ensure two things:

1) the block device remains available during the call
2) we ensure avoid having to deal with the fact we're using the
   request_queue structure in atomic context, since the last
   blk_put_queue() will be called upon disk_release(), *after*
   our own bdput().

This means this code path is *not* going to remove the request_queue
structure, as we are ensuring some later upper layer disk_release()
will be the one to release the request_queue structure for us.

Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: yu kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
---
 mm/swapfile.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 6659ab563448..5f6f3a61b5c0 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -3753,6 +3753,7 @@ static void free_swap_count_continuations(struct swap_info_struct *si)
 void mem_cgroup_throttle_swaprate(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int node,
 				  gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
+	struct block_device *bdev;
 	struct swap_info_struct *si, *next;
 	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_IO) || !memcg)
 		return;
@@ -3771,8 +3772,18 @@ void mem_cgroup_throttle_swaprate(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int node,
 	plist_for_each_entry_safe(si, next, &swap_avail_heads[node],
 				  avail_lists[node]) {
 		if (si->bdev) {
+			bdev = bdgrab(si->bdev);
+			if (!bdev)
+				continue;
+			/*
+			 * By adding our own bdgrab() we ensure the queue
+			 * sticks around until disk_release(), and so we ensure
+			 * our release of the request_queue does not happen in
+			 * atomic context.
+			 */
 			blkcg_schedule_throttle(bdev_get_queue(si->bdev),
 						true);
+			bdput(bdev);
 			break;
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-09 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-09 21:45 [RFC v2 0/5] blktrace: fix use after free Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-09 21:45 ` [RFC v2 1/5] block: move main block debugfs initialization to its own file Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-10  2:48   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-09 21:45 ` [RFC v2 2/5] blktrace: fix debugfs use after free Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-10  2:52   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-10 19:58     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-11 23:09       ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-14  3:32         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-09 21:45 ` [RFC v2 3/5] blktrace: ref count the request_queue during ioctl Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-10  2:58   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-09 21:45 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2020-04-10  3:02   ` [RFC v2 4/5] mm/swapfile: refcount block and queue before using blkcg_schedule_throttle() Bart Van Assche
2020-04-10 14:34     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-09 21:45 ` [RFC v2 5/5] block: revert back to synchronous request_queue removal Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-10  3:12   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-10 14:34     ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-10 20:50       ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-10 21:27         ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-11 23:21           ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-14  3:38             ` Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200409214530.2413-5-mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nstange@suse.de \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).