From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
axboe@kernel.dk, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, keescook@chromium.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: avoid fdput() after failed fdget() in ksys_sync_file_range()
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 02:21:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200508022139.GD11244@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200508002422.GL23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 01:24:22AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 01:05:09AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 05:57:09PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > Fix ksys_sync_file_range() to avoid fdput() after a failed fdget().
> > > fdput() doesn't do fput() on this file since FDPUT_FPUT isn't set
> > > in fd.flags. Fix it anyway since failed fdget() doesn't require
> > > a fdput().
> > >
> > > This was introdcued in a commit to add sync_file_range() helper.
> >
> > Er... What's the point microoptimizing the slow path here?
>
> PS: I'm not saying the patch is incorrect, but Fixes: is IMO over the
> top. And looking at that thing,
> {
> struct fd f = fdget(fd);
> int ret;
>
> if (unlikely(!f.file))
> return -EBADF;
>
> ret = sync_file_range(f.file, offset, nbytes, flags);
> fdput(f);
> return ret;
> }
>
> might be cleaner, but that's a matter of taste...
This makes it easier to read.
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-08 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-07 23:57 [PATCH 0/2] fs: avoid fdput() after failed fdget() Shuah Khan
2020-05-07 23:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs: avoid fdput() after failed fdget() in ksys_sync_file_range() Shuah Khan
2020-05-08 0:05 ` Al Viro
2020-05-08 0:24 ` Al Viro
2020-05-08 2:21 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2020-05-08 15:07 ` Shuah Khan
2020-05-07 23:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs: avoid fdput() after failed fdget() in kernel_read_file_from_fd() Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200508022139.GD11244@42.do-not-panic.com \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).