From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
"Souptick Joarder" <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] docs: mm/gup: pin_user_pages.rst: add a "case 5"
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:34:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200601113424.GF3960@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200601052633.853874-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
On Sun 31-05-20 22:26:32, John Hubbard wrote:
> There are four cases listed in pin_user_pages.rst. These are
> intended to help developers figure out whether to use
> get_user_pages*(), or pin_user_pages*(). However, the four cases
> do not cover all the situations. For example, drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> has a "pin, write to page, set page dirty, unpin" case.
>
> Add a fifth case, to help explain that there is a general pattern
> that requires pin_user_pages*() API calls.
>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Looks good to me. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst b/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst
> index 4675b04e8829..6068266dd303 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/pin_user_pages.rst
> @@ -171,6 +171,24 @@ If only struct page data (as opposed to the actual memory contents that a page
> is tracking) is affected, then normal GUP calls are sufficient, and neither flag
> needs to be set.
>
> +CASE 5: Pinning in order to write to the data within the page
> +-------------------------------------------------------------
> +Even though neither DMA nor Direct IO is involved, just a simple case of "pin,
> +write to a page's data, unpin" can cause a problem. Case 5 may be considered a
> +superset of Case 1, plus Case 2, plus anything that invokes that pattern. In
> +other words, if the code is neither Case 1 nor Case 2, it may still require
> +FOLL_PIN, for patterns like this:
> +
> +Correct (uses FOLL_PIN calls):
> + pin_user_pages()
> + write to the data within the pages
> + unpin_user_pages()
> +
> +INCORRECT (uses FOLL_GET calls):
> + get_user_pages()
> + write to the data within the pages
> + put_page()
> +
> page_maybe_dma_pinned(): the whole point of pinning
> ===================================================
>
> --
> 2.26.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-01 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-01 5:26 [PATCH v2 0/2] vhost, docs: convert to pin_user_pages(), new "case 5" John Hubbard
2020-06-01 5:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] docs: mm/gup: pin_user_pages.rst: add a " John Hubbard
2020-06-01 11:34 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2020-06-01 5:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vhost: convert get_user_pages() --> pin_user_pages() John Hubbard
2020-06-02 6:08 ` Pankaj Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200601113424.GF3960@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jrdr.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).