From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFAFAC433E0 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:47:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18B820801 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:47:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="s/fgYIdO" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726308AbgFLSrD (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 14:47:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39196 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726263AbgFLSrD (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 14:47:03 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D82EC03E96F; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:47:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=M0XBJfmj5g8OJJK5rxLSCulz9dzgt9BdEfOunG21ngo=; b=s/fgYIdONJS4GCDdvwRhAF5jzW upm5xZgPDmZJeteqcu71CEpHpf9RpVCDk0XWLJIOVkNiywX/wNV+1Pf4LifGNTCyyj0qhnlUrjSRj xP3x1ifhkugQFbKW0i+o8WJ05hBJrtq7nkVhxB3lIOctDoOPEqOkH9bZwAwe5lO4UjvmxYHaPPlpl V3Pbcb5QMpAU1V+Mem8LelY/ZHIt0Sq+vGIFFwjZPbToDMNAved65dI8HGKB1KHUTANIYqkHka9hd OuEXtYmoIhBMy0Q8XiEMd5cwalnqHr4ApISoreZzm8QaiFvkbly0B99aUdFRKBFHS0bRBZOPbFTBf dH4PdCbQ==; Received: from willy by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjohh-0002hB-PJ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:47:01 +0000 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:47:01 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Markus Elfring Cc: Kaitao Cheng , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan , Colin Ian King , Muchun Song Subject: Re: [v2] proc/fd: Remove unnecessary variable initialisations in seq_show() Message-ID: <20200612184701.GI8681@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20200612160946.21187-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com> <7fdada40-370d-37b3-3aab-bfbedaa1804f@web.de> <20200612170033.GF8681@bombadil.infradead.org> <80794080-138f-d015-39df-36832e9ab5d4@web.de> <20200612170431.GG8681@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200612182811.GH8681@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:43:41PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> The presented suggestions trigger different views by involved contributors. > > > > Most of the views I've heard are "Markus, go away". > > Do you not hear these views? > > I notice also this kind of feedback. > The clarification is still evolving for these concerns and communication difficulties. > > I suggest to take another look at published software development activities. Do you collateral evolution in the twenty? > I got also used to some communication styles. > I am curious to find the differences out which hinder to achieve a better > common understanding. My quantum tunnelling eases the mind. > > For example, instead of saying something weird about "collateral evolution" > > you could say "I think there's a similar bug here". > > * Why do you repeat this topic here? * Can communication be achieved? * Will you twice the program? > >> How do you think about further function design alternatives? > > > > Could you repeat that in German? I don't know what you mean. > > I imagine that you could know affected software aspects better. Murph had other ideas.